Matthew says that Jesus tells his disciples to "Honor your father and mother" (Matt 19:19), but Luke thinks that Jesus requires his followers to hate their parents, "Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother...cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14.26)
Couldn't God find a way for one to be a disciple of Jesus without having to hate one's parents? Certainly, he could. Thus, Luke must have been mistaken about what Jesus said, and the Bible is once again in error.
When a disciple begs for permission to bury his father, "Lord, first let me go and bury my father," Jesus told him to let him rot: "Follow me, and let the dead bury their own dead." (Matthew 8:21-22)
Jesus was in such a hurry that he wouldn't let his disciples at least make sure his father wasn't eaten by dogs? How likely is this? Jesus must have known that the end wasn't coming for another two thousand years, so why couldn't he have given his disciple a little time off to "honor" his father?
Now, really...who can imagine that Jesus really said this? Isn't it more likely--by far--that Matthew was wrong about what Jesus said? If so, then the Bible is once again in error. If you can't trust it here, perhaps it can't be trusted anywhere.
Joseph F. Alward
"Skeptical Views of Christianity and the Bible"
http://members.aol.com/jalw/joseph_alward.html