What is your practice?
2. Re-read Carla's post, she sums it up so well
I'm a registered clinical psychologist working in an emergency hospital setting, dealing on a daily basis with individuals who are at high risk of serious self harm. In my work, I come across people from a range of religious persuasions, including fundamentalist Christians, Mormons, Adventists, JWs and more mainstream churches.
It is interesting to note that children raised in these groups do present to emergency departments with self harm especially early adolescence. The main problems of many of these children revolve around fearing that their parents will disapprove or "pray" over them if they ever found out about their mental health difficulties. it is not uncommon to see young males suffering depression and suicidal ideation because they fear their parents and God will condemn them because of their sexual orientation.
Believe me, any clinician working in this setting quickly realises that no one religious group has the self-harm/suicidal ideation market cornered. Everyday we see the tragic consequences of the fundamentalist outlook on young people. But I wish not to overstate the picture because the majority of people from these religions never present with mental health problems.
Another point I have often made on this forum is that correlation does not equal causation. Even if it were established that JWs present to mental health services at a higher rate than the general population, it would only establish correlation, not causation. The biggest mistake made by non-peer-reviewed articles on mental illness - of which Jerry Bergman is a prime example - is concluding that the organization causes it and then working backwards to prove it does. As I have often stated, there are other plausible explanations, including the following: People who are already prone to mental illness are attracted to and affected more by religions that promise easy answers; mental ilness could be a consequence of membership in a disliked group (i.e., the dominant culture oppresses smaller groups). That these alternative explanations are not even considered by the likes of Bergman suggests a bias that is more suited to propaganda than so-called social-scientific inquiry.