1917 Watchtower Schism Documents PDFs

by cabasilas 13 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • cabasilas
    cabasilas

    I've had these items laying around for awhile and thought I'd make PDFs of them. They are scans of some of the actual documents from the 1917 Schism at Watchtower headquarters: the dispute between Rutherford and 4 members of the Board of Directors. As far as I know, these exist as text files on a couple of sites and are also on another site with garish watermarks through them. These are all in public domain, so feel free to use them as you wish:

    Light After Darkness

    http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=ca55d6605596684df58cab2a1387184b

    Facts for Shareholders

    http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=be8c03ee488a922a278e9ff2a68588a2

    Open Letter to All the People of the Lord

    http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=7156c1ad6795bceebf451063b0486958

    1918 Proxy

    http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=3e6f437dd89c464fc08988f04e7e7210

    If anyone has Rutherford's Harvest Siftings (I and II), I'd love to see scans of those made available as well.

  • Atlantis
    Atlantis

    Cabasilas:

    Excellent! Thank you cabasilas for these files!

    Cheers! Atlantis-

  • garybuss
    garybuss

    Got em! Thanks!

  • Gayle
    Gayle

    I am sorry I don't have time right now to read all this..Seems there was the 'controversy', what was it? Also, is it known the amount of those "Bible Students" then and what percentage left the group at that time?

  • SirNose586
    SirNose586

    Thanks for the Open Letter and the Proxy; I had the others.

    Nice to have actual letters from the time period. The thing is, no dub gives a rat's patootie about the split.

  • cabasilas
    cabasilas

    SirNose, Gary and Atlantis: You're welcome! Glad you could use them.

    Gayle,

    This was right after Rutherford was made President of the WT Society and 4 of the 7 Board of Directors felt he was taking too much power to himself. The majority of the board began to oppose Rutherford's tactics and a June meeting of the board tabled the idea of restructuring the by-laws to make sure the board controlled the Society and not just Rutherford. Instead, before the board could meet again, Rutherford pre-empted them by dismissing them on a technicality and he installed his own people on the board instead. This was the same day Rutherford released the book The Finished Mystery (which had been written and published without the board's knowledge--nor reviewed by the editorial committee for the Watch Tower set up in Russell's Will).

    All ironic, if you consider that in 1975 the Governing Body effectively de-throned the Office of the President from controlling the Society. The Governing Body (which earlier had been virtually identical with the Board of Directors of the Pennsylvania Corp) took full control of the Society in January of 1976. So, in 1975 it was Jehovah's will that the Society be led by a group of senior elders, but in 1917 the same idea was contrary to God's will!

    The booklets here present the view of the majority of the Board of Directors in 1917 that the Society should be directed not by the will of one man.

    As to your second question about the number of people who defected at that time. There were many who left, but most stayed with Rutherford, at least initially. However, as he took on more and more power and began jettisonning some of Russell's doctrines, many old-timers left to join the various Bible Student groups that were set up. By about 1928, the vast majority of the old-timers had left. Rutherford referred to the minority who stayed with him as the "remnant."

  • Tatiana
    Tatiana

    Filed away....I will read them tomorrow and definitely post them for my "witness" friends to read.

  • chasson
    chasson

    It is interesting to note that the By-Laws from Rutherford voted in January 1917 are in the transcript of the Moyle Trial and the proposed reformed By-Laws from the 4 directors are in "Facts for Shareholders". Many thanks to you, cabasilas, i will add this material to my site to complete the biography of Rutherford.

  • RR
    RR

    I have them somwhere, also have Paul S.L. Johnson's "A Respone to Harvest Siftings Reviewed" and a few other items of that era.

    RR

  • chasson
    chasson

    If you want to made them available freely RR, you are welcome !!!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit