The problem with making judgements about religion is that it is all too easy to dismiss the value of its ( usually) unsupported beliefs.
Guys like Dawkins and Hitchens extol the value of atheism - as if they could prove that a life without illusion is somehow "better".
Related to this, we may also think that objective facts should overcome True Believers simply upon their confirmation. Life just doesn't
work that way. Humans want and need fantasy like food and air. Perhaps the real comparision ought to be about the benefits of competing
illusions.
The above struck me when I read that a poll of engineering students cited "Scotty" as their inspiration!
http://www.zianet.com/ehusman/weblog/2005/07/more-power-we-know-y-cn-do-it.html
Take a good look at the Mormon church - how silly can you get in examining its origins? A second rate con artist writes a hack novel
about Jesus appearing to 'Injuns' and millions of otherwise rational people believe it because he STUCK TO HIS STORY! Meanwhile,
Mormons build colleges, businesses and enter politics - inspired to change the world.
Education and position in society do not eliminate the need for fantasy - and may actually intensify it. How many academics do you
know who actually think that voting for this or that candidate makes any critical difference? Or discuss the environment with emotion
usually associated with religious zeal?
Whatever the 'warts' of Christianity, I firmly believe that it motivated Western people in ways that Buddhism and other philosophical
approaches did not. Human technological development exploded in Judeo-Christian lands and is now spreading into Asia.
I can recall the words to an Anglican hymn "Jerusalem". You aspire to build "Jerusalem" in England and everywhere else.
We need illusions to inspire us. Maybe the real choice is what illusions are healthy...
metatron