Warlock:
Everyone agrees that taking a representative sample is going to be subject to a small margin of error. HOWEVER this is how all research is done!
When something is proven scientifically, the scientists take SAMPLES of the population to test. It is accepted that given a large enough sample of appropriately random participants (varying ages and sexes) then you can apply the result to society as a whole, albeit with a small margin of error.
Its impossible to measure the entire population every time we want to measure something.
Sirona,
Thank you for being the one to FINALLY bring up "the point", without me having to.
I am very well aware how polls, surveys etc. are done, in spite all the personal insults trying to indicate otherwise.
Well, how about looking at that method in another way, namely "independent thinking", exactly what many here say they have developed since they left the WTS.
The study by PEW, as I said previously, takes their "sample" and then paints a picture, with a very broad brush, that this applies to the American public.
The most accurate statement, WITHOUT misleading, or "brainwashing", which, by the way is another buzzword that some here like to say they are no longer susceptible to, since leaving the WTS, would be "of those Americans PARTICIPATING in this survey............."
In any survey, or poll, taking a small sample only PROVES THE THOUGHTS OF THOSE PARTICIPATING.
For the simple reason that the entire population CANNOT be polled, as you brought out, automatically make the results suspect, WHEN APPLIED TO THE WHOLE.
Warlock