''This Site Is Spiritual Pornography''

by minimus 32 Replies latest jw friends

  • sir82
    sir82

    ALREADY IS BLONDIE

    Yep, at least certain types, anyway.

    There was a BOE letter a couple of years ago. Basically, it broke porn down into 2 types, "milder" and "extreme" (don't recall the exact terms used). Occasional viwing of the "milder" form (Playboy, etc.) will just merit "strong counsel", but repeated viewing of the stronger kind (I believe it mentioned child porn, bondage, violence, etc.) can definitely lead to a DF. It is considered "uncleanness with greediness" (a phrase mentioned somewhere in the Bible).

    It was one of the most disturbing BOE letters I ever read, not the least for the fact that it specifically mentioned child pornography but never even hinted that possession of such is a felony. It just outlined the congregational actions to take.

  • minimus
    minimus

    Sir, the Society feels they need not include legal issues in spiritual matters.

  • sir82
    sir82
    the Society feels they need not include legal issues in spiritual matters.

    Except of course when it suits them.

    "Oh, we're sorry, that information about Brother Child-Raper is legally protected by clergy-penitent privilege. But we hope Jehovah continues to bless you!"

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit