The WTS are upping their opposition to further education.
At our recent CO visit , much of a talk on “youth” concerned the evils of college & university education.
The meeting of the elders & ms included a similar but harder line section , stating that the “appointed men” should set an example. The question was raised “Does an elder continue to qualify for his privilege if he , his wife , or his child goes to further education. What attitude is he showing regarding the FDS stated view on this matter?”
2 hypothetical examples were given:
(1) An elders son who is an architect and who aux pios several times a year decides to obtain some supplementary education to update his qualification. (Presumably OK - though it begs the question as to how he became an architect in the first place.)
(2) An elder has strongly encouraged his daughter to go to uni & is actively advocating this in the cong & stating that this will secure a better income for both him & his daughter. (Deletion certainty.)
There is a ms in the cong who has both his sons at university - he looked extremely embarrassed.
The WTBTS are really pushing this line very strongly at the moment.