Nice work on the website.
I also agree with Farkel that in view of their lame library card argument, the focus must be on what they had to do to maintain that relationship with the UN and what the evidence shows.
The "soft" articles they've written over the past years do seem to fit that they knew exactly what was required to be accredited every year.
Further, why did WT representatives innitially assume the membership was for humanitarian purposes or to make "representations" to the UN? Where was the simple library card reason in the beginning if it was the sole reason for being associated?
Finally, whether the WT Society knew or was completely ignorant, there is no escaping that they of their own volition solicited the UN to be associated with the DPI, and thus led 6 million+ Witnesses into an adulterous apostate relationship with 'the scarlet coloured wild beast'.
At the very least, this carelessness has cost them confidence in their ability to lead.
Path