a particular group of people taught others that the World Trade Center was destroyed on Sept. 11, 1981 (instead of 2001) how silly would that be?
If people knew their history they would know that GW Bush was president at the time of the attack (Reagan was president in 81). They would know that Al Qeada did not exist in 1981. They would know the first Gulf War had not been fought yet, etc...
But what if they were not aware of these facts? What if two thousand years from now the events of 9/11 were just a footnote in history? What if the people being taught that the attack occured in 81 were also taught not to trust outside sources of info?
It seems silly to us today to think 9/11 happend in 81, but thousands of years from now a 20 year difference would not seem like a big deal. But it is a big deal. Plugging a historical event randomly into an erroneous date messes up the historical timeline in a big way.
Forgive my thinking outloud here, but as I thought about this it really brought home to me the foolishness of the WT insisting that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607BCE.
What a big fat lie and what a way to cover it up (info control)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
changeling :)