Watchtower Blood Component/Fraction Deception

by jwfacts 25 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • jwfacts
    jwfacts

    The Watchtower attempts to create a semblance of logic to its allowance of blood fractions by presenting the concept that blood consists of four primary "components". Use of these components are unchristian. These components can be broken into "fractions", which are acceptable to use. (w04 6/15 p. 21)

    alt

    This Watchtower distinction of fractions from components is used to make it appear that a component is somehow different and hence more of a violation when used than a fraction. The fact is that a component is a fraction, these are interchangeable terms. Many medical texts refer to red and white blood cells as fractions. Likewise, text books discuss the breakdown of plasma into components.

    The classification of blood into the four major components or fractions of plasma, red cells, white cells and platelets is a common one. It is accurate, albeit a basic simplification that has arisen from what results when blood is processed through a centrifuge. The result is

    • plasma
    • buffy coat (white cells and platelets)
    • red cells.

    However, this classification is only one of many ways to describe blood.

    Blood is alternatively classified as being made of four major components of plasma, fat globules, chemicals and gas - with red and white cells being considered fractions of plasma. (http://www.mcghealth.org/greystoneData/content.asp?pageid=P02316)

    Alternatively, "blood consist of cellular material (99% red blood cells, with white blood cells and platelets making up the remainder), water, amino acids, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, hormones, vitamins, electrolytes, dissolved gases, and cellular wastes." http://chemistry.about.com/cs/5/f/blbloodcomp.htm

    Simply put, blood plasma is a liquid made up of water, water red cell, white cells, platelets, proteins, glucose, mineral ions, hormones, carbon dioxide, immunoglobulins, growth factors, albumin, plus a host of other substances.

    Watchtower discussion that blood comprises four components is deceptive; as their use of this definition is to make it appear breaking a component into a fraction becomes acceptable. In reality, many of the allowed "fractions" are suspended in the plasma in much the same manner "components" such as red cells are suspended in plasma.

    For example, the hierarchal system the Watchtower presents is intended for it to appear that a platelet is more offensive to God than Immunoglobulin. However, in reality these are both components suspended in the plasma, and whilst "acceptable" immunoglobulin composes 1.7%, platelets compose only 0.5% of the volume of blood.

    The Bible writers were unaware of any of these definitions. Blood was not separated by a centrifuge. Blood was simply regarded as blood. To contain some semblance of logic, the Watchtower should either allow blood use, or not allow it - in any form. If it wishes to disallow whole blood but (somewhat illogically) allow blood fractions, then all fractions should be considered acceptable, including red and white cells.

  • zeroday
    zeroday
    Simply put, blood plasma is a liquid made up of water

    AS such the WTS should ban the eating of water...

  • RubaDub
    RubaDub

    I think even Jesus would have needed a Powerpoint presentation to try to explain this convoluted mess to the masses.

    Rub a Dub

  • Doubting Bro
    Doubting Bro

    Right. I remember when I still believed and "fractions" started being acceptable, I spent literally hours researching which of the acceptable fractions would really be ok. I was using the logic presented by the WTS that some of the plasma "fractions" (I think the proteins but don't remember for sure) were passed from mother to infant and since God allowed the sharing in that situation, it should be ok. Well, in that research I found out that a whole lot more than plasma proteins are passed and that WBCs are in breast milk. That was the first time I openly researched a WTS stand on anything outside of WTS literature.

    I was stunned when hemoglobin was allowed since that is the main component of RBCs.

    To me, this whole position is just a baby step to making the medical use of blood a "conscience" matter that will not receive discipline or be considered a DA'ing act (which it is today). They couldn't just drop the blood ban cold because of the lawsuits. I'm convienced this is a well thoughtout plan to attempt to mitigate lawsuits. The use of whole blood and even just the banned components has been reduced medically as the technology improves to allow doctors to use only what they need. So, although people are dying because of this stupid rule, there are not as many as there were in the past.

    I believe there will come a time in the not too distant future (either a sucessful lawsuit or the death of the major forces with Bethel that are behind the ban) when the medical use of blood will be viewed as an organ transplant. They've already laid the groundwork anyway, especially in that Blood Awake from last summer. Of course, they won't apologize or make restitution for all the deaths their wrong policy caused and lay any blame at the feet of the r&f. But, what else is new?

  • jwfacts
    jwfacts
    blood will be viewed as an organ transplant.

    I have been thinking the same, but doubt they need to go that far, as it is very rare to need a whole blood transfusion. It seems to me more likely that whole blood will remain banned, but any blood fraction, including red and white cells will be a conscience matter. Conscience matter as then they relieve legal liability, but don't have to come straight out and admit it is ok.

  • TD
    TD

    You're absolutely right. No one could have said it better.

    Systems of categorization exist entirely for the convenience of the one making the distinction.

    There are many other ways blood components could be classified. (e.g. Solid and Liquid; Cellular and Non-cellular)

    JW's have simply co-opted the system blood banks use to package and sell blood products to hospitals and pharmaceutical companies and they continue to pretend that it holds some special significance with God.

  • M.J.
    M.J.

    Great writeup.

    If you tell tell the doctors, "JWs can accept blood fractions", you'll just get a blank stare! (I know!)

  • fifi40
    fifi40

    I was one of those takers of fractions.............I had to have Anti D after my pregnancies because of my blood group and my husbands, to prevent harm to future possible babies.

    I never really got this 'matter of conscience' issue...........either you can or you cant.............but I did anyway........and I am glad.

    So this has always been a cause of concern to me and one of which I spoke to elder about who recently visited me.........his answer 'We may not have got everything right yet'............I think he is probably soooooo right he has no idea.

    Trouble is if they totally reverse their decision about blood they would be looking at potential mass law suits for people who have lost family members because of their flawed doctrine and they would certainly lose many congregational members!!!

  • jwfacts
    jwfacts
    'We may not have got everything right yet'

    This is what my mother says - "It is not right yet, but the light is getting brighter." I am not sure how that is supposed to justify unecessary deaths.

    An elder told me it doesn't matter if it is illogical, because fractions are a conscience matter and JWs can refuse the take them. Again, hardly a logical justification.

  • Anti-Christ
    Anti-Christ

    I see all of this just a way to confuse the RandF so that they leave the thinking to the GB.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit