The soberlng question then emerges for us, by the standard of Deuteronomy
18:20-22, which the Society and we anxiously and quickly apply to others, how
. should we view the Society?
*ACCEPT
OR BE WORTHY OF DEATH? Does the Society demand absolute obedience? Do they feel a Christian must
follow Society Interpretations, even when these interpretations of scripture are
wrong, or be liable for eternal death? Notice the following quotes from the Walsh vs.
Lathram trial cited above under the heading "Unity."
Question: "Back to the point now. A false prophesy was promulgated?
Covington (Society): "I agree to that."
Question: "It had to be accepted by Jehovah's Witnesses?"
Covington (Society): "That is correct."
Question: "If a member of Jehovah's Witnesses took the view hlmself that that prophecy
was wrong and said so wouid he be disfeilowshipped?"
Covington (Society): "Yes..
. Our purpose is to have unity."Question: "Unlty at ail costs?"
Covlngton (Society): "Unity at all costs."
Question:
"And the person who expressed his view, as you say, that it was wrong,and was disfellowshipped, would be in breach of the Covenant
If he was baptlzed . . . And as you said yesterday expressly, would be worthy of death?"
Covington (Soclety):
"I WILL ANSWER YES, UNHESITATINGLY."
Sadly that was back in 1976 and their ranks still grew.