Transfusion breakthrough as human blood grown from stem cells

by truthseeker 17 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • truthseeker
    truthseeker

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article4567387.ece

    August 20, 2008

    Transfusion breakthrough as human blood grown from stem cells

    Mark Henderson, Science Editor

    Vials of human blood have been grown from embryonic stem cells for the first time during research that promises to provide an almost limitless supply suitable for transfusion into any patient.

    The achievement by scientists in the United States could lead to trials of the blood within two years, and ultimately to an alternative to donations that would transform medicine.

    If such blood was made from stem cells of the O negative blood type, which is compatible with every blood group but is often in short supply, it could be given safely to anybody who needs a transfusion.

    Stem-cell-derived blood would also eliminate the risk of transmitting the pathogens that cause hepatitis, HIV and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) through transfusions.

    Scientists behind the advance said that it has huge therapeutic potential and could easily become the first application of embryonic stem-cell research to enter widespread clinical use. “Limitations in the supply of blood can have potentially life-threatening consequences for patients with massive blood loss,” said Robert Lanza, of Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) in Massachusetts, who led the experiments. “Embryonic stem cells represent a new source of cells that can be propagated and expanded indefinitely, providing a potentially inexhaustible source of red blood cells for human therapy. The identification of a stem cell line with O negative blood type would permit the production of compatible ‘universal donor’ blood.”

    Blood comes in four groups, A, B, AB and O, and in two rhesus types, positive and negative, and only some of these are compatible with one another. A person with type A, for example, can donate to people with type A or AB, and receive blood of type A or O. Only O negative blood can be given to any patient.

    While there is no national shortage of donated blood in Britain, O negative blood sometimes runs low. It is also used widely in military medicine.

    The research also has more immediate clinical promise for efforts to turn embryonic stem cells into other types of tissue, to treat conditions such as diabetes and Parkinson’s.

    One of the biggest safety hurdles that must be cleared before stem-cell therapies enter clinical trials is the risk of uncontrolled cell growth causing cancer. Red blood cells, however, do not have nuclei that carry the genetic material that goes wrong in cancer, and thus should not present this danger. “This could be one of the biggest breaks for the early clinical application of embryonic stem cells,” Dr Lanza said. “There is still work to be done, but we could certainly be studying these cells clinically within the next year or two.”

    While a few red blood cells have been created from embryonic stem cells before, the ACT team is the first to mass-produce them on the scale required for medical use. They also showed that the red cells were capable of carrying oxygen, and that they responded to biological cues in similar fashion to the real thing. About two thirds had no nucleus, which suggests that they are fully fledged adult red blood cells, and the researchers hope to bring this closer to 100 per cent. Details of the research are published in the journal Blood.

    Though embryonic stem cells were used in this experiment, it may be possible to create blood from reprogrammed adult cells, also known as induced pluripotent (IPS) cells. These would circumvent some ethical objections to the use of embryonic tissue.

    Independent scientists welcomed the work. Professor Alex Medvinsky, a blood stem cell expert at the University of Edinburgh, said: “The problem with relying on donated blood is that there are always shortages. The ability to generate red blood cells in very large numbers would be a very big thing.”

  • yknot
    yknot

    Regenerative medicine is making progress in leaps and bounds!

    Isn't it an exciting time to be living in!

  • Gordy
    Gordy

    <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1047054/Scientists-create-limitless-supply-blood-stem-cell-breakthrough.html>

    Scientists create 'limitless supply of blood' in stem cell breakthrough

    Scientists have grown huge quantities of red blood cells for the first time - a breakthrough that could make blood donations a thing of the past.
    The researchers harnessed stem cell technology to create cells from blood types A, B and O. They found the lab-grown cells were as good as natural ones at carrying oxygen - raising the possibility of creating artificial blood for use in transplants.
    Robert Lanza, one of the world's leading stem cell scientists, said: 'You wouldn't have to worry about shortages because you could create as many as you want.'
    Red blood cells are now used more often than blood in transfusions, added Professor Lanza, of U.S. company Advanced Cell Technology, so the breakthrough has the potential to save countless lives.
    Hospitals could also stockpile bags of artificial blood as a safeguard for when their own stocks run low, she said.
    The blood, which could be tested on humans for the first time next year, could prove invaluable on the battlefield, at the scene of road accidents and in other situations when the natural version is not readily available.
    The advance also raises the prospect of mass-producing supplies of the ' universal donor' blood type O-negative, which can be safely transfused into any patient, whatever their blood group.
    It is in short supply - only eight per cent of Caucasians have it and just 0.3 per cent of Asians.
    Synthetic blood could also be safer, because it should be free of hepatitis, HIV, and other deadly diseases, New Scientist magazine reports.
    The National Blood Service welcomed the advance, but urged donors not to stop giving blood. Spokesman Gareth Bell said: 'There is a continuous need for donors to come forward because we need to make sure blood is there for patients when they need it.'
    Mohandas Narla, a U.S. expert in blood cell biology, called the results 'a very good start'. But he pointed out that the research has yet to make sure the cells will survive long enough in the human body to be useful.
    Natural red cells circulate for around 120 days.

  • MissingLink
    MissingLink
    Isn't it an exciting time to be living in!

    Sure is! Once you forget about the fake new system promises, you really can appreciate the progress that really IS being made.

  • wobble
    wobble

    This will be haled by Dubs as a blessing from jehovah as they will be able to have blood transfused,and one of the big objections from the public is removed.I can hear it now"We must be sooooo near the end that Jehovah wants the work to go ahead apace,so has arranged it that we can now have blood" What about the poor people who have died in the past 50 years?

    Love

    Wobble

  • TheSilence
    TheSilence

    Thank you, truthseeker, for posting this.

    Jackie

  • undercover
    undercover

    Has the Society ever made mention of stem cell research in any of its publications in the last few years?

    Used to be that when a new breaktrough was announced the Society was pretty quick to condemn new procedures as unbiblical somehow. I haven't heard anything about them taking a position on stem cell research. If they had come out against stem cell research, then it would be hard for them to taut this new blood supply as beneficial.

    I suspect that maybe their going to distance themselves from anything medical from this point on. They have to deal with the blood transfusion mess they created for themselves along with a few other procedures they've counseled against, but if they're smart, they'll just drop any medical counsel from their program and let the new generation dubs do what they want.

  • AlmostAtheist
    AlmostAtheist
    if they're smart, they'll just drop any medical counsel from their program and let the new generation dubs do what they want.

    This really would be a great time to get out of the medical business, wouldn't it? They could find some way to make this "lab-grown blood" okey-dokey from a doctrinal standpoint, while continuing to condemn transfusions from donated blood. If this technology takes hold, they'll put donated blood out of business and the whole doctrine will be moot. They never have to say "we're wrong", nobody sues them, and as a side-bonus, no more JW's have to die.

    "QFR: Is it appropriate for a Christian to accept laboratory-grown blood into his body?"

    "The scriptures plainly tell us to 'pour out on the ground' that blood which is removed from a body. But what of blood-like substitutes that are grown in a laboratory? The Bible does not give us clear direction on this point, so it would be up to the conscience of each individual Christian to decide for himself."

    Dave

  • Mary
    Mary
    This will be haled by Dubs as a blessing from jehovah as they will be able to have blood transfused,

    I sincerely doubt it. The Borg is, at present, very leary of stem cell therapy. Second, since the blood is made from a human being's stem cell, it would still have to be transfused into the patient. Since their bizarre paranoia of having blood transfused into a human is still intact, I'd be amazed if this is something the Organization would actually approve of. Sort of like their theory that in vitro fertilisation with a woman's egg and another man's (other than her husband) sperm constitutes "adultery".

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    "Vials of human blood have been grown from embryonic stem cells for the first time during research that promises to provide an almost limitless supply suitable for transfusion into any patient. "

    Aw 02 11/22 p5 " Medical Marvel,Ethical Minefield

    The main focus of concern is that the process of extracting embryonic stem cells essentially destroys the embryo. This, explains the National Academy of Sciences, "deprives a human embryo of any further potential to develop into a complete human being. For those who believe that the life of a human being begins at the moment of conception, ESC [embryonic stem cell] research violates tenets that prohibit the destruction of human life and the treatment of human life as a means to some other end, no matter how noble that end might be."

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit