...Does Truth need New Light?...

by OUTLAW 17 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    "If your Speaking Truthfully"..Are you going to change,what you have to say?.....If your Caught in a Lie..Are you going to change what you have to say?..............What is more likely,to need"New Light?.."The Truth,or a Lie?............................Clint Eastwood...OUTLAW

  • crazyblondeb
    crazyblondeb

    I think they need a new company to manufacture their light bulbs.

    The ones they have seem to be malfunctioning.

  • shamus100
    shamus100

    They need to get some new blood in there - OFF WITH THE HEADS OF THE OLD MANAGERS!

    JC Cannon should be the replacement!

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    You would`nt need to Change your Story..If you were Truthful the First Time!!.....................New Light is a cover-up for:.."Oop`s,I just F*cked-Up millions of Peoples live`s!!!!!!!!!!!!!..What do I do Next?"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!................................Laughing Mutley...OUTLAW

  • wobble
    wobble

    As has been pointed out before,there is no such thing as New Light, if the old teaching was error it was NOT light,and if the FDS were teaching error or falshoods then,why should their new "understanding" be any more reliable?

    Love

    Wobble

  • Witness 007
    Witness 007

    There is no turth......there is no lie....just be........sorry I'm trying to sound all intellectual!

  • DoomVoyager
    DoomVoyager

    Euclid's Elements are every bit as true now as they were 2300 years ago.

  • yknot
    yknot

    (2

    Corinthians11:14-15) . . .And no wonder, for Satan himself keeps transforming himself into an angel of light. 15 It is therefore nothing great if his ministers also keep transforming themselves into ministers of righteousness.
  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    relative truth needs new light. ABSOLUTE truth does not

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    Aldous huxley called it perennial philosophy:

    "At the core of the Perennial Philosophy we find four fundamental doctrines.

    First: the phenomenal world of matter and of individualized consciousness--the world of things and animals and men and even gods--is the manifestation of a Divine Ground within which all partial realities have their being, and apart from which they would be non-existent.

    Second: human beings are capable not merely of knowing about the Divine Ground by inference; they can also realize its existence by a direct intuition, superior to discursive reasoning. This immediate knowledge unites the knower with that which is known.

    Third: man possesses a double nature, a phenomenal ego and an eternal Self, which is the inner man, the spirit, the spark of divinity within the soul. It is possible for a man, if he so desires, to identify himself with the spirit and therefore with the Divine Ground, which is of the same or like nature with the spirit.

    Fourth: man’s life on earth has only one end and purpose: to identify himself with his eternal Self and so to come to unitive knowledge of the Divine Ground.
    In Hinduism the first of these four doctrines is stated in the most categorical terms. The Divine Ground is Brahman, whose creative, sustaining and transforming aspects are manifested the Hindu trinity. A hierarchy of manifestations connects inanimate matter with man, gods, High Gods, and the undifferentiated Godhead beyond."

    http://members.tripod.com/~parvati/perennial.html

    These four doctrines have been coming through in various forms for 2500 yrs, through mahayana buddhism, taoism, some christian mystics, moselm sufism, hindu vedanta, greek philosopher plato, plotinus, some new ageism, pantheism, psychedelic drugs, my own meditations to an extent.

    The difference between the four 'truths' and religion is that religion is always second hand and the four truths can be arrived at personally, although many people do not seem to have the ability.

    The point is that those truths keep coming to the surface, centruy after century, stated and described in different words from different points of view. The descriptions may be stated differently and in parts, but the theme is the same.

    While modern science is not able to examine them, they do not interfere w science. Since it has been around for so long in various forms, and because of my own limited experince w it, i tend to believe that they are true. None of the wt teachings are even close to truth.

    S

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit