Well I know I did! To make a long story short... nah, i'll just tell it the way it is. About 3-4 years ago, a @#$@ "brother" made a talk at an assembly. Now, what made this talk so peculiar was that he used a quote from Matt Groening who apparently said "I'm sorry I created the Simpsons, cause I see it has a bad influence on my children... this was to show that the "world" is very, VERY BAD.
Since I was (and still am) a devoted Simpsons fan, I was completely shocked when I heard that "quote". But it took another year to finally get my courage and talk to an elder about it, in the service. We argued about it, and argued some more, and what it came down to is: the quote is right, you're wrong, the brother has more experience than you do, the simpsons are BAD, like most other tv programs, and shut up, will 'ya? But I still believed something didn't tick right. So he told me he would talk to the brother who was in a different cong.
A few months later, the elder proudly told me the quote was taken directly from the Time magazine. I shrugged, and said something like "OK". It took a whole night to find that quote in the Time site, because the article wasn't that recent. When I did find it, guess what I saw? The quote the brother had said wasn't what Matt Groening had said AT ALL!!! Matt had said that maybe Bart Simpson, one of the characters, had a bad influence on his children. Did he regret creating the Simpsons? NO. Did he regret creating Bart? NO. No, no, no. So, a month later (I'm not a courageous guy!) I went back to the elder with this newfound info. I knew it was pointless. But I wanted to prove my point. What did he say? Something like "Oh well, you should listen to older brothers, cause they have more experience than you, and the Simpsons are still bad" DARN IT! I had just shown him the brother had said false info to a huge audience, who's parents probably didn't trust the Simpsons that much before, and who now hated it with a vengeance. (although my JW mom likes watching the Simpsons when she can... she agreed the Simpsons weren't perfect, but it didn't compare to the other tv progs such as south park etc.) ARGH.
Flash forward to 2 years later. (About... 6 months ago.) Our DO (district overseer) comes by to replace our CO. When I can, I go to him and mention the info. i found regarding a certain talk which was given 2-3 years ago. (somehow, i believed it was this DO which had given that talk... woops) He remembered it (!) and agreed with me that brothers should be very careful about what they say at assemblies. Hurrah! The freaking DO had agreed with me! With this "support", I went back to the elder and talked to him again about it. Pointless, I know. We discussed, and you know the rest. He again refused to admit the brother was wrong (maybe he knew, but he just couldn't say it) and changed subject many times to a vocabulary slip he had made years ago and had been reproved for, which was completely not comparable to the misinformation the other @#$@ "brother" had given JW's. And that was the end of that.
Was I correct the whole time? Of course! the DO said I was! and it is now with great vigor that I can say I HATE that elder with a vengeance. I just hate him. Can't have a good discussion with him without him winning, putting me down, etc. Oh well... that was my pointless argument.
Did you folks ever have something you just had to prove to someone, even though you knew it was pointless??? Share please!