I would love to see anyone attempt to Scripturally prove this chart wrong.
If you cannot do so, then you must concede that the requirements for baptism imposed by Jehovah's Witnesses go FAR beyond the requirements for first century Christian baptism.
Quote:
1 Corinthians 4:6 — Now, brothers, these things I have transferred so as to apply to myself and Apollos for your good, that in our case you may learn the [rule]: “Do not go beyond the things that are written.” Galatians 1:8-9 — However, even if we or an angel out of heaven were to declare to you as good news something beyond what we declared to you as good news, let him be accursed. As we have said above, I also now say again, Whoever it is that is declaring to you as good news something beyond what you accepted, let him be accursed. |
Jehovah's Witnesses call quite a lot of doctrine "good news" that goes far beyond what the Galatians accepted. The Apostle Paul said that neither he nor an angel out of heaven had the authority to add to the good news, but the Governing Body often presumes that authority.
Paul said anyone doing so should be "accursed" or 'anatema' in the Greek. Anathema, in English. Disfellowshipped in JW speak.
That is how Paul judged the Governing Body, as 'anatema' for teaching something beyond what was written, beyond what the Galatians accepted.