Glen Howe died

by wannaexit 25 Replies latest jw friends

  • Honesty
    Honesty

    I'm willing to bet that Mr. Howe has now finally discovered that the JW's are a false religion.

    May God have mercy on his soul.

  • Rabbit
    Rabbit
    Glen How was born March 25, 1919, in Montreal. He died Dec. 30, 2008, of pneumonia in Georgetown, Ont. He was 89, and suffered from prostate cancer. A full obituary is forthcoming

    Aha! He also followed the unhealthy WT advice about masturbation. Good for him.

  • RAYZORBLADE
    RAYZORBLADE

    Wow!

    Glen How. Someone we all heard of up here in Canada, many times over our JW existence; outside of it too. Yes, I do recall Vicki's trial back in 2003.

    Anyways, 89 eh?

    I forgot all about his name until I came across this information here this a.m..

    Never met the man; but knew he was one of the grand poobahs up here back in the day.

  • Spike Tassel
    Spike Tassel

    http://alt.nntp2http.com/obituaries/2009/01/052a16aa8b2d2181e289c028197a1b95.html

    Glen How; jurist helped win freedoms for all Canadians

    Von: Hyfler/Rosner ([email protected]) [Profil]
    Datum: 22.01.2009 06:24
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    Newsgroup: alt.obituaries

    GLEN HOW, 89: JURIST

    He helped win freedoms for all Canadians
    Long before the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, he acted as
    counsel at the Supreme Court of Canada in a quintet of cases
    that established fundamental freedoms of religion,
    expression and assembly
    SANDRA MARTIN

    [email protected]

    January 21, 2009


    As a lawyer, Glen How had only one client. From the time he
    was called to the bar in Ontario in 1943 until the day he
    stopped practising, well into his 80s, he spent his entire
    professional career protecting and promoting the interests
    of the Jehovah's Witnesses.

    A slight, dapper man with a shock of white hair, he looked
    almost biblical, despite his short stature, as he thundered
    about the rights and entitlements of his co-religionists in
    courtrooms across the country and around the world. "The
    thing about Glen How that always struck me was that he would
    never take no for an answer. He just soldiered on because,
    ultimately, he believed that if he could just explain the
    issues, he would eventually get a fair hearing and a fair
    result," said lawyer William Kaplan, author of State and
    Salvation: The Jehovah's Witnesses and Their Fight for Civil
    Rights. "If he got no in one court, he would just move the
    matter to another court and if he got no there, he would
    move it further."

    And so he did all the way to the Supreme Court in the 1950s,
    as counsel in a quintet of cases that established
    fundamental freedoms of religion, expression and assembly
    more than two decades before the Charter of Rights and
    Freedoms was promulgated. "He was a very hard-working and
    tenacious lawyer, but he was wise enough to know that he
    couldn't do all the heavy lifting himself, so he would
    prepare the briefs and the submissions and then enlist
    others, such as constitutional expert Frank Scott, to help
    him argue cases before the court," Mr. Kaplan said.

    Mr. How wasn't always successful - far from it - especially
    in defending the rights of Jehovah's Witnesses to refuse
    blood transfusions for their children during medical
    emergencies. But in a series of landmark legal decisions, he
    did help to extend an adult's right to make personal
    decisions about his or her own health-care treatment.

    Jehovah's Witnesses, who believe we exist in a satanic
    world, live in anticipation of the end of this world and the
    recreation of a new one in which they will be saved. They
    disdain state institutions - although they recognize that
    they must pay taxes, they abhor patriotic demonstrations,
    abstain from military service, try to claim conscientious
    objector status in wartime and decline to salute the flag or
    to sing the national anthem.

    But Mr. How was an anomaly. He practised his faith devoutly
    while using the country's institutions to win guarantees for
    Witnesses' rights. He respected the courts and was willing
    to accept the trappings of our society if they didn't
    overtly violate the tenets of his faith.

    For example, in the late 1950s, lawyer John Honsberger, then
    a member of the Civil Liberties Committee of the Canadian
    Bar Association, was surprised that Mr. How was not included
    on the list of lawyers awarded the honorific Queen's
    Counsel.

    "He was the foot soldier on the ground, going into the
    courts, and I was on the sidelines, cheering him on," Mr.
    Honsberger said in an interview. He thought Mr. How was "an
    outstanding counsel" who deserved the QC designation at
    least as much as the 50 or 60 lawyers on the list. After
    writing to the attorney-general's office to tell them so,
    Mr. Honsberger was enlisted as an emissary to ask Mr. How
    whether his religious beliefs would preclude him accepting
    the honour. Mr. How, after ascertaining that he wouldn't
    have to swear an oath recognizing the Queen as head of
    state, was more than happy to join the QC ranks.

    "It showed the integrity of the man - that he wasn't going
    to take an award that many people would have been glad to
    have if it was going to subordinate his faith," said Mr.
    Honsberger.

    It was this ability to navigate between religious and legal
    worlds that made Mr. How such a powerhouse lawyer for the
    Jehovah's Witnesses. In winning freedoms for them, he helped
    establish implied rights for everyone. In doing so, he
    influenced legalists, intellectuals and civil libertarians,
    including future politicians such as Pierre Trudeau, who
    went on to introduce the Charter legislation as prime
    minister in 1982.

    Glen How, the elder of two sons of Frank and Bessie How, was
    born in Montreal just after the First World War. The family
    moved to Toronto when he was about a year old and settled in
    the Kingston Road area, in the city's east end. His father
    was an accountant and personnel manager at paint
    manufacturer CIL and his mother was a homemaker. When Glen
    was 5 and his younger brother John (Joe) was 3, his mother
    answered a knock on the door of their Toronto home and fell
    into conversation with George Rix, a Jehovah's Witness.

    Mrs. How was impressed and soon began attending meetings of
    the Bible Students, as Witnesses were called in those days.
    By 1929, she was a pioneer - a full-time minister - a
    calling she followed until she died in 1969. Initially, her
    husband was opposed to his wife's conversion, but he
    gradually condoned it, although he never became a Witness
    himself.

    After graduating from Vaughan Road Collegiate in 1936, Glen
    enrolled at the University of Toronto, graduating with a
    bachelor's degree in 1940 and then proceeding to Osgoode
    Hall Law School. Apparently, his mother was not surprised by
    his career choice, having frequently predicted that her
    argumentative son - "that little rascal" - was destined for
    the law. He was called to the bar in Ontario in 1943. (He
    subsequently qualified in Quebec, Alberta and Saskatchewan.)

    As a teenager, Glen was not "very interested in spiritual
    things." His conversion came about more because of civil
    injustice than religious belief. On July 4, 1940, shortly
    before Mr. How went to law school, the Liberal government of
    prime minister Mackenzie King used the War Measures Act to
    ban a number of organizations, including the Jehovah's
    Witnesses. Canada had been at war since the previous
    September, but after France fell in June, there was an
    understandable fear that the Germans would cross the channel
    and invade Britain. It was a treacherous environment in
    which conscription might well need to be enforced, and the
    Witnesses were suspect because of their opposition to
    saluting the flag and serving in the armed forces. The ban
    might also help placate generally anti-conscription and
    Catholic Quebec, which feared Witness teachings and
    practice.

    It was "the turning point in my life," Mr. How wrote in a
    2000 biographical article in Awake!, a magazine published by
    the movement. "When the full power of the government
    targeted this tiny organization of innocent, humble people,
    it convinced me that Jehovah's Witnesses were Jesus's true
    followers."

    At the time, Nazi Germany was the only other country to have
    issued such an edict. "This ban ranks as the single most
    serious interference with religious liberties by the state
    in all of modern Canada's history," Mr. Kaplan wrote in
    State and Salvation.

    Mr. How was baptized on Feb. 10, 1941. After his call to the
    bar in Ontario two years later, he began working as general
    counsel for the still-illegal Witnesses. He relentlessly
    argued that Jehovah's Witness ministers, many of whom had
    been interned in labour camps, were entitled to
    conscientious-objector status, like other clergy. He also
    defended the rights of the children of Jehovah's Witnesses
    to refuse to sing the national anthem in school ceremonies.
    Some of these children were expelled from school and removed
    from their parents' care. Late in 1943, he travelled to New
    York to seek help with his appeals from the wily and
    experienced Hayden Covington, the Watchtower Society legal
    counsel who eventually won 36 out of the 45 cases he argued
    before the U.S. Supreme Court.

    After the war, the federal government rescinded many of its
    strictures against the Witnesses, but there was one
    jurisdiction - Quebec - where religious freedom was not
    observed. There were fewer than 500 Witnesses in Quebec, but
    Union Nationale leader Maurice Duplessis, who was both
    premier and attorney-general, waged a campaign against them
    with all the authority in his administrative and legal
    arsenal. He considered the Witnesses a serious threat to the
    dominance of the Roman Catholic Church because of their
    strident condemnation of the gospels and the manner of their
    proselytizing - knocking on doors, preaching in people's
    homes and assembling in large gatherings.

    Between 1946 and 1953, Witnesses were involved in more than
    1,500 criminal prosecutions, ranging from disturbing the
    peace to sedition. Mr. How spent so much time commuting to
    and from Quebec that he moved there in the late 1940s to set
    up a legal practice. Every morning, his first job was to
    find out how many Witnesses had been arrested the day before
    and then try to arrange bail for them. A frequent client was
    his brother, Joe, who ministered with Laurier Saumur
    (obituary, May 5, 2007) on the streets of Quebec City.

    Joe How was supposed to attend the Watchtower Bible School
    of Gilead in Patterson, N.Y., for training as a Jehovah's
    Witness minister in 1945, "but they had to get me [and Mr.
    Saumur] out of jail first," he said in an interview. "It was
    a blessing in disguise because before you go to that school,
    you have to read the Bible through from one end to another
    and it gave us six months to do a little studying."

    Quebec City, which was Mr. Duplessis's political stronghold,
    had enacted a bylaw forbidding the distribution of "any
    book, pamphlet, booklet, circular, or tract whatever without
    having previously obtained ... the written permission of the
    chief of police." In response, the Witnesses produced
    "Quebec's Burning Hate," a four-page tract listing names,
    dates and places of violence against Jehovah's Witnesses,
    and began distributing it across Canada in late 1946.

    Within days, Mr. Duplessis declared "a war without mercy
    against the Witnesses of Jehovah" and ordered sedition
    charges laid against anyone caught distributing the
    pamphlet. He personally revoked the liquor licence of
    Montreal restaurateur Frank Roncarelli, a Jehovah's Witness
    who was a prime source of bail money. (Mr. Roncarelli closed
    Quaff, his Crescent Street restaurant, six months later
    because his income had been so seriously diminished. He sued
    Mr. Duplessis for damages.)

    In the first sedition case to go to trial, Mr. How, who had
    still not been called to the bar of Quebec, worked under
    Jewish lawyer A. L. Stein to defend a Jehovah's Witness
    named Aimé Boucher. Meanwhile, Mr. Saumur, who had been
    arrested numerous times for violating the flyer bylaw, filed
    a civil suit against Quebec City.

    The Boucher, Saumur and Roncarelli cases went to the Supreme
    Court in the 1950s. The Boucher case, which used truth as a
    defence, eliminated an archaic Quebec law defining sedition
    as criticism of the government and led to the dismissal of
    nearly 125 sedition charges. The Saumur case, which relied
    on a defence of freedom of expression and religion,
    established that issuing licences to restrict a person's
    rights to practise his or her faith was beyond municipal or
    provincial authority and led to the dismissal of more than
    1,000 bylaw charges. And the Roncarelli case established
    that publicly elected officials cannot arbitrarily invoke
    the law against individuals, as Mr. Duplessis had done.

    Not all of the cases Mr. How argued were as widely
    celebrated in the larger world. Some, especially the ones in
    which he fought for the right to refuse blood transfusions,
    especially for children, are medically and ethically
    problematic for many people. Jehovah's Witnesses believe the
    Bible prohibits the eating or consumption of blood, a
    stricture that encompasses transfusions and most blood
    products, even in life-threatening medical emergencies. Mr.
    How was counsel for the Jehovah's Witnesses in Supreme Court
    of Canada appeals that allowed medical intervention on
    behalf of underage children and in an Ontario Court of
    Appeal case that confirmed an adult's right to make
    health-care treatment decisions.

    In 1954, Mr. How married Margaret Biegel, a British
    Jehovah's Witness. They had no children and she worked as
    his secretary as his law career expanded. She died of cancer
    in 1987.

    Two years later, in November, 1989, Mr. How married Linda
    Manning, a young American lawyer and Jehovah's Witness who
    had moved north to work in the Canadian organization's legal
    department. Until well into his 80s, Mr. How continued to
    represent the Witnesses' legal interests, appearing as
    consultant counsel in Osaka, Japan, in 1993 and in Singapore
    from 1994 to 1996.

    The American College of Trial Lawyers gave him its Award for
    Courageous Advocacy on Sept. 8, 1997, the first time a
    Canadian lawyer had received this distinction. In honouring
    him, the college said Mr. How had, "throughout the course of
    his long career, demonstrated courage and commitment as a
    trial lawyer, as an appellate lawyer and as a human being."

    He was awarded the Law Society Medal of the Law Society of
    Upper Canada in 1998, a certificate of appreciation and
    recognition from the Bar of Montreal the following year. In
    2000, he was named an officer of the Order of Canada for
    "consistently and courageously" fighting legal battles to
    advance civil liberties and helping "pave the way" for the
    Canadian Bill of Rights and Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
    Calling him a "man of conscience," the citation lauded him
    for working at "minimal compensation" to defend clients "in
    every province of Canada, many American states and several
    other countries."

    GLEN HOW

    William Glen How was born March 25, 1919, in Montreal. He
    died Dec. 30, 2008, in Georgetown, Ont., of pneumonia as a
    result of complications of prostate cancer. He was 89. He is
    survived by his wife, Linda. He also leaves his brother,
    Joe, and extended family.

    [ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

  • Iamallcool
    Iamallcool

    Just pic fyi

  • talesin
    talesin

    What's the expression?

    oh yah, "The Devil's Advocate" .....

    I see he lived to a ripe old age, and probably very well ... it's too bad the same can't be said for his victims.

    t

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit