I don't read the Bible very much. I don't call God 'Jehovah', either.
You know why, of course, both the Bible and 'Jehovah' make me think of the WTBTS. That, folks, is a very unpleasant memory, so if Satan is living in Brooklyn, he's succeeded in pushing me away from the Good Book. Until recently!
I recall, as a JW, being horrified when people from other faiths would say: "The Bible is wonderful, because you can make it fit any situation or problem. You can interpret it just the way you want to".
Sacrilege! The Bible is inflexible! It is the word of God and not open to interpretation by man!
Hmm. I think, maybe, that this is where many of us make a mistake. Take the Creation account for instance, the Adam and Eve thing. Now I'm pretty sure that this tale comes via word of mouth and is probably a highly simplified version of mans earliest memories with a dose of morality thrown in by the writer. I expect the same thing applies to the Flood. Definitely a local phenomenon loosely based on a cataclysmic event, nonetheless it provides rich pickings for a writer who wants to be listened to seriously. Cheers, Moses.
The same with Paul in the NT, lots of his own wisdom on top of his "Christ crucified" message, some of it very good, some of it appallingly bad. Typical, in fact of someone who is used to being listened to.
So now, yes, I do read the Bible more than I used to. Is it inspired of God? Nah! No way. But now I can pick and choose what I want to, whatever suits me and discard the stuff that doesn't appeal. Some would say that was... well, I'm not really sure, but something with an "..asy" on the end, I expect.
Come to think of it, maybe that's what God wants us to do so as bring out our srengths and weakneses, maybe it is inspired after all! Oh dear..
Englishman.
Bring on the dancing girls!