An Internet Apostate (page 8)

Yadirf

Lilacs

Friday, come on shuckems, I asked you to be nice. Am I going to have to turn you over my knee and spank you?

Aw, shucks, Lilacs ... , you called me "shuckems". Now if that ain't sweet. But you know as well as I do, my Lilacs, that you couldn't spank a flea for fear that you'd hurt it and break out crying. But you gotta admit that considering everything I have been relatively "nice".

Lilacs: Don't pay Venice any mind, will ya. She's still having repercussions from our short-lived relationship, and needs a little more time so that she can move on without me. She'll be okay, once she has her next fling.

Yadurfy,
who has his eyes
on a purple flower.

Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

Erich

yadirf wrote:

Erich

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But you could HELP brothers - "victims of apostates" - in finding appropriate answers, so that they could be able to stand against destructive criticism. Why don't you help if someone has got troubles ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You mean "victims of apostates" who are apostates themselves.

Well it's sorta like this, Erich:

According to 1 Corinthians 2:9 only those who are spiritual people with a close relationship with Jehovah can understand deep spiritual things. This naturally excludes apostates from having any understanding of anything having to do with spiritual matters...
Yadirf

Question:

Am I an apostate in your eyes too? Please give me an answer.

Erich

Yadirf

Erich

No, you're not an apostate Erich.

I've got some other work to do for a while and so won't be back on the board perhaps until later this evening. Have a great day, won't you.

Yadirf

Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

dubla

yadirf-

oh great nitpicker, please forgive me for missing one other word change.....it was like staring at one of those "where are the differences" picture games, and i really did think i had found the only word change. again, another oversight on my part, and thank you again for nitpicking to the extent of unitentional praise to me. (again, the harder you work at picking apart my statements to find fault, the better it makes me look.)

You mean to say that with THOSE bug-eyes you can’t see any better than that? Actually though, I know that your problem isn’t physical eyesight. It’s that you just haven’t got any smarts.

wow, more mud slinging, what a refreshing change! surely youre not so delusional that you actually believe these mindless insults make you look better......but then again, maybe im overestimating you again.

I guess that now you’re probably gonna tell me that you didn’t deliberately say “that was the only word change you made”, huh?

nope, why would i say that? i will say that this is a simple oversight though, and not an intentional lie. actually you know it was an oversight, becuase you alluded to it above when you were so happily ripping the fact that i missed another word. so how can you accuse me of missing the word change, and in the same breath accuse me of lying about it (it cant be both ways, to lie would mean i wouldve seen the word change and deliberately ignored it in my statement)? of course, this line of reasoning is no doubt to complicated for you, so if youd like me to break it down in smaller words, i can try.

its funny that every time you post a message with the intent of making me look bad, it always has the opposite affect (making yourself look worse, when we all thought you couldnt go any lower). thats funny ironic, not funny ha ha.

aa

Yadirf

Liar Donkey's Butt Dummy Dubba Bubba Dubla

So you want to play a little more do you? Okay.

again, another oversight on my part, and thank you again for nitpicking to the extent of unitentional praise to me. (again, the harder you work at picking apart my statements to find fault, the better it makes me look.)

'Fraid not, Dubla. It makes you look all the more stupid and dishonest, because you used the word "exact". When the word exact is used it doesn't imply that something is only approximate, or basically correct, or essentially correct. Instead, the word "exact" means just that ... 100% accuracy.

"Exact" defined:

Strictly and completely in accord with fact; not deviating from truth or reality: an exact account; an exact replica; your exact words.

So even as you've been so many times on past occasions, you were WRONG again here, Dubla, twice over regarding the word-changes alone. And due to you having denied that you were wrong about there being more than just the one word-change after I called that to your attention, that made you a liar since you disagreed with the truth that there was more than one.

Yadirf

Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

mindfield

Funny how the GB can use "exact" when talking about their 1975 end-of-the-world prophecies, and then say "woops" with no problem, and non-JW's have no right to excuse themselves when using such a "grand" term.

Okay, so no one can use exact, be mistaken and not be a liar... except for the GB.

Well, I hope this is enought for Yadirf to

1. Make fun of my nick
2. Nitpick my post
3. Say something like "We're not talking about the GB, STUPID!!!"
4. Talk about past posts for no reason
5. And whatever else you did with dubla...

Yadirf

Mindless Mindfield

Funny how the GB can use "exact" when talking about their 1975 end-of-the-world prophecies, and then say "woops" with no problem, and non-JW's have no right to excuse themselves when using such a "grand" term.

Oh so you want to get in on the lying too do you, MM. How is it that the GB got by with “no problem” as you say. Isn’t that primarily about all you people harp about here, is how things didn’t go quite as the WTS had expected? Haven’t you apostates pointed your fingers at the WTS regarding that error? And yet you expect me to not call your hand when you do similar things. You’re stupid, MM!!!

Okay, so no one can use exact, be mistaken and not be a liar... except for the GB.

Now see how bright you really are, MM? Do you actually think that you can negate the fact that Dubla has lied by bringing up what you only think to be a similar comparison. Even if there were to be a comparison, you little ankle-biter, two wrongs don’t make a right.

2. Nitpick my post
3. Say something like "We're not talking about the GB, STUPID!!!"

Oh, so you think it’s okay for the goose but not for the gander. Well take a look at this thread and see if you can see where you’re buddies have violated the things you think so outrageous.--> http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=17287&site=3

Yadirf

Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

Erich

Hi yadirf,

many thanks for answering my question.

I think, all what we can do in this forum is:

a) Proclaiming the existence of YHVH (JHWH) and the explanation of the
name (tetragrammaton)
b) Showing the unconditional necessity of a new righteous world order
c) Proclaiming the fact that YHVH (JHWH) is going to establish that.

That's all. Any efforts beyond that are in vain.
erich

dubla

yadirf-

'Fraid not, Dubla. It makes you look all the more stupid and dishonest, because you used the word "exact". When the word exact is used it doesn't imply that something is only approximate...........So even as you've been so many times on past occasions, you were WRONG again here, Dubla, twice over regarding the word-changes alone. And due to you having denied that you were wrong about there being more than just the one word-change after I called that to your attention

okay friday, whatever makes you happy. i already admitted i was wrong, they were oversights, and if you wish to keep blowing it up as some kind of spectacle, then please continue to do so. bottom line is, youve managed to derail the actual topic in both threads that youve continued this line of badgering........if you get some sort of pleasure magnifying my oversights, then i guess ive provided you some hapiness. im glad to have been of help.

that made you a liar since you disagreed with the truth that there was more than one.

this is the only part ill call you on, because you are dead wrong with this line of reasoning, and the fact that you continue to carry out this line of reasoning, further detracts points from your apparent intelligence level, which was already close to nonexistant. a lie is deliberate, my oversight was not. simple logic, but apparently not simple enough for your capacity.

the challenge still sits, for you to post my deliberate lies, which you have not done, and will not do (because they arent there). why do you even bother entering into a battle of wits unarmed like this?

aa

TR

Yardif,

what a dink, man. You think because I like guns and have a permit to carry one, I'm some kind of lunatic.LOL! What would happen if some freak postal worker started shooting up the place and the cops were powerless to take him out?

Your reply to my last post just verifies the kind of sad psyche you may have.

TR

I'm gonna make mince meat outta that Osama!

An Internet Apostate

Share this