Usage of the internet

by joelbear 11 Replies latest jw friends

  • joelbear
    joelbear

    Most people use the internet for two main purposes.

    1. To gather information, both factual and editorial, on subjects that they have an interest in or a need for.

    2. To communicate with other people that have similar interest in topics they have an interest in, in order to exchange information on a one to one basic. This is done through instant message, emails, discussion forums and chat rooms.

    Both of these purposes could also be fulfilled through offline activities and most people use both sources to meet their needs.

    Then, there are people who use the internet to invade other people's personal space by purposely disrupting discussion forums or chat rooms. Some of these people go further by sending unwanted email and/or instant messages.

    These people also typically engage in antisocial behavior just as name calling, threats and insults and also very typically braggadocio. They have found an outlet for pent up frustration and rage that they cannot legally and/or safely indulge in within offline settings. Every discussion forum on any subject matter has them.

    I have seen them show up in as innocent a place as an online card playing community to wreak havoc by joining games, throwing a few insults and then moving on.

    They are the vandals of the internet. Just as vandals invade other public places where people seek to enjoy their lives, they invade spaces on the internet as well.

    Fortunately, they are easier to tune out on the internet an unlike graffiti vandals or those who in other ways defame the beauty of the world, their damage is less permanent here.

    Joel

  • mindfield
    mindfield
    1. To gather information, both factual and editorial, on subjects that they have an interest in or a need for.

    Does looking at pictures of... questionable... human... anatomy count?

  • dubla
    dubla

    joel-

    did you break into yadirfs shrinks office and steal the good doctors notepad? im guessing so by these words:

    Then, there are people who use the internet to invade other people's personal space by purposely disrupting discussion forums or chat rooms. Some of these people go further by sending unwanted email and/or instant messages.

    These people also typically engage in antisocial behavior just as name calling, threats and insults and also very typically braggadocio. They have found an outlet for pent up frustration and rage that they cannot legally and/or safely indulge in within offline settings.

    so whats the prognosis doc? is there any hope? LOL.

    aa

  • joelbear
    joelbear

    Dubla,

    I see no value in constantly goading him. I have taken a turn at serious discussion with him twice, but will not again.

    Just as I have chosen to not respond to Fred Hall or NYT, I now choose not to respond to him.

    You Know still presents some interesting discussion points whether one agrees with his positions or not. So, for now, I will continue to take part in his discussions although I wish he too would do away with the silly insults and chiding LOL's that he insists on peppering his posts with. They make him seem silly. Which I think is a shame since in the midst of all that, he does draw some interesting conclusions, some that I agree with, some that I disagree with.

    Joel

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    Just as I have chosen to not respond to Fred Hall or NYT, I now choose not to respond to him.

    Now THAT hurt!!! I mean that really HURT!!! I mean THAT REALLY DID HURT ME TERRIBLY!!! Aww, enough with such horse poop ... the fact is it couldn't have pleased me more! One reason is because I know that you "choose not to respond" to me because you know that your buddies here WILL respond in your behalf anyways. It was impossible to have a serious dialogue due to the abundance of nonsense that your buddies, such as Dubla, kept injecting into such threads in defense of their apostate friend.

    Oh my, what have I done ... I've done went and got shunned by a gay apostate. Horrors of horrors of HORRORS!

    Yadirf,
    the shunned one.

    Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

  • dubla
    dubla

    friday-

    one more response from me for the day.....

    It was impossible to have a serious dialogue due to the abundance of nonsense that your buddies, such as Dubla, kept injecting into such threads.
    if you look back over your threads, youll see that it was not "nonsense" that i was "injecting into" them, but it was indeed valid points, such as the ones i raised on the "star" threads, that you simply refused to respond to. the nonsense, youll see upon reexamination, actually came from you, 100%, with your "bug eyes" thread being the epitomy of "nonsense", im sure most would agree. if you could please post a list of links where i injected "nonsense" into your otherwise "serious dialogue", i would appreciate it.......otherwise ill take this statement of yours as a complete lie.

    aa

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    You Know still presents some interesting discussion points whether one agrees with his positions or not. So, for now, I will continue to take part in his discussions

    Take part in his discussions? You have quite an imagination, Joelbear. Haven't you ever noticed that You Know NEVER responds to you? In other words you're talking to yourself, Joelbear. (giggle) So, you go right ahead and continue to "take part" in You Know's discussions. (Giggle, giggle) There's something you've always been a professional at, Joelbear. And what's that? One word: EXAGGERATION

    Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf

    Liar Donkey's Butt Dummy Dubba Bubba Dubla

    if you could please post a list of links where i injected "nonsense" into your otherwise "serious dialogue", i would appreciate it.......otherwise ill take this statement of yours as a complete lie.
    One is all that's necessary:
    i love the way you disguised your post as a fake letter to the society, very nice. http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=15854&site=3&page=2
    THAT was completely nonsensical on your part, and your very first comment in that thread at that. Now, go ahead and lie your way out of this one even like you think you have every other predicament you've gotten yourself into.

    Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

  • Mr Ben
    Mr Ben

    "Of what help is anyone who can only be approached with the right words?"
    E Bibesco, Haven

    Religion n.
    An organisation designed to promote atheism.

  • dubla
    dubla

    yadirf-

    again, you do not surprise me with your lack of argumentative skills, i expect it now.

    It was impossible to have a serious dialogue due to the abundance of nonsense that your buddies, such as Dubla, kept injecting into such threads in defense of their apostate friend.
    this was the quote i was referring to, was it not? you said i had injected "nonsense" in defense of my apostate friend (joel). no where in the link you posted did i defend joel in any way, but nice try. as far as my post being "completely nonsensical", theres no need for me to "lie my way out of" it, unless by explaining myself i can be accused of lying. that particular post of mine acutally included some solid arguments against your ridiculous star theory, and later in that thread i posed several arguments that YOU COULDNT EVEN RESPOND TO they were so solid. none of that was nonsense. so me calling your letter to the society was "nonsense" to defend joel in your mind? well, i stand by the fact that your letter REALLY looks like a fake....nothing more than bait on a troll wire, but if you insist that it was acurate, then i really have no evidence to refute that. others will have to make their own conclusion, that was simply my conclusion, and was not "nonsensical" in any way.

    so the challenge is still there for you yadirf, to post links to evidence of my injection of "nonsense" to "defend" my "apostate fried". the other challenge still stands as well, you quoting a deliberate lie from me (and i think youre a bit confused on this one, not surprisingly....you see, opinions and oversights do not count as deliberate lies by anyones definition.....and you did accuse me of being a deliberate liar, did you not??).

    also, one last thing, and this one is complete curiosity.....why did you change my name from "lying donkeys...etc" to "liar donkeys...etc"? just wondering, they are both so witty, i didnt know if it was a deliberate change by you, or simply an oversight.

    aa

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit