Retired Seattle Police Chief: Marijuana no laughing matter, Mr. President

by SixofNine 11 Replies latest jw friends

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Norm Stamper, Retired Seattle police chief, member of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition


    The president's busy. He's got important things to do, like rescuing the economy, saving jobs and mortgages and industries. But we ought not to let him off the hook for his frivolous dismissal of a widely popular question he faced in Thursday's Online Town Hall.

    At the top of the televised event, the president announced that of the 3.5 million votes on the thousands of questions received in advance, one topic "ranked fairly high." It was whether legalizing marijuana would improve the economy and encourage job creation. He responded: "The answer is no, I don't think that is a good strategy to grow our economy." He then asked rhetorically what the question says about "the online audience."

    Get it? His in-the-flesh audience got it, chuckling politely at the allusion to a Stoner Nation plugged in to the "internets."

    The problem for Mr. Obama is that marijuana reform was at or near the top of the list of all questions in three major categories: budget, health care reform, green jobs and energy. Our leader doesn't seem to understand that millions of his interlocutor-constituents are actually quite serious about the issue.

    Which is not to say that drugs, particularly pot, doesn't offer up a rich if predictable vein of humor. Cheech and Chong's vintage "Dave's not here!" routine is still a side-splitter. As Larry the Cable Guy would say, "I don't care who you are, that's funny right there."

    But there's nothing comical about tens of millions of Americans being busted, frightened out of their wits, losing their jobs, their student loans, their public housing, their families, their freedom...

    And show me the humor in a dying cancer patient who's denied legal access to a drug known to relieve pain and suffering.

    Having just returned from Minnesota whose state lawmakers are entertaining a conservative, highly restrictive medical marijuana law, I can tell you what's not funny to Joni Whiting.

    Ms. Whiting told the House's Public Safety Policy and Oversight Committee of her 26-year-old daughter Stephanie's two-year battle with facial melanoma that surfaced during the young woman's third pregnancy. The packed hearing room was dead quiet as Ms. Whiting spoke of Stephanie's face being cut off "one inch at a time, until there was nothing left to cut." She spoke of her daughter's severe nausea, her "continuous and uncontrollable pain."

    Stephanie moved back to her family's home and "bravely began to make plans for the ending of her life." The tumors continued to grow, invading the inside and outside of her mouth, as well as her throat and chest. Nausea was a constant companion. Zofran and (significantly) Marinol, the synthetic pill version of THC, did nothing to abate the symptoms. Stephanie began wasting away. She lost all hope of relief.

    Joni's other children approached their mother, begged her to let their sister use marijuana. But Ms. Whiting, a Vietnam veteran whose youngest son recently returned from 18 months in Iraq, was a law-abiding woman. And she was afraid of the authorities. There was no way she would allow the illicit substance in her house. As she held her ground, her grownup kids removed Stephanie from the family home.

    Three days later, wracked by guilt, Joni welcomed her daughter back. "I called a number of family members and friends...and asked if they knew of anywhere we could purchase marijuana. The next morning someone had placed a package of it on our doorstep. I have never known whom to thank for it but I remain grateful beyond belief." The marijuana restored Stephanie's appetite. It allowed her to eat three meals a day, and to keep the food down. She regained energy and, in the words of her mother, "looked better than I had seen her in months."

    Stephanie survived another 89 days, celebrating both Thanksgiving and Christmas with her family.

    Shortly after the holidays, Stephanie's pain became "so severe that when she asked my husband and me to lie down on both sides of her and hold her, she couldn't stand the pain of us touching her body."

    Stephanie died on January 14, 2003 in the room she grew up in, holding her mother's hand. A mother who, as she told the legislative committee, would "have no problem going to jail for acquiring medical marijuana for my suffering child."

    Following Joni Whiting's presentation, it was all I could do to hold it together during my own testimony. Such was the power of this one woman's story. And of the sadness and rage roiling inside me as I reflected on the countless other Stephanies who are made to suffer not only the ravages of terminal illness and intractable pain but the callousness and narrow-mindedness of their leaders.

    When I finished my testimony, a local police chief, a member of the committee, angrily accused me of disrespecting the police officers in the room--who'd shown up in force, in uniform, to oppose medical marijuana. Wearing a bright yellow tie with the lettering "Police Line, Do Not Cross," the chief charged me with placing more stock in the opinions of doctors than of Minnesota's cops. Guilty, as charged. Who are we, I asked him, to substitute our judgment for that of medical professionals and their patients? Who are we, for that matter, to deny the will of the people.

    There's much value in humor, even during times of pain and tragedy. So long as the joke is not at the expense of the suffering.

    It's been a bad couple of weeks for the president. His Leno comment about the Special Olympics while self-deprecating and not malicious was certainly tone deaf, followed soon after by his casting gratuitous aspersions at serious advocates of marijuana reform.

    But Barack Obama is a decent and honorable man, compassionate and wise. I can't believe he would do anything other than what Joni Whiting did if, God forbid, he faced similar choices within his own family. I can't believe he doesn't realize the political value of taking a more reasoned, courageous stand on drug policy reform in general. Or of at least providing honest, thoughtful answers on the issue.

    Perhaps we should show him what's in it for him? Perhaps we should make certain that in every future "town hall" the president is reassured of the seriousness of the legions of voters working to end cruel and ineffective drug laws.

    Git-er-done!

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Pot laws are no laughing matter

    Aaron Houston

    Tuesday, March 31, 2009


    President Obama responded last week to the most popular question submitted by online voters - whether marijuana should be made legal in order to bring this huge underground industry into the legal economy - by treating it pretty much as a joke.



    But the time for jokes has passed. Our marijuana laws are killing people.

    The horrifying drug-war violence on our southern border continues to worsen: beheadings, daily killings that now number more than 6,000, and honest officials fearing for their lives. U.S. marijuana laws subsidize these murderous gangs.

    Some 60 to 70 percent of the profits that fuel the Mexican cartels come from marijuana. The chief of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Mexico and Central America Section recently told the New York Times that marijuana is the "king crop" for Mexican cartels, which have active operations in 230 U.S. cities.

    Like it or not, marijuana is a massive industry. Some 100 million Americans admit to government survey-takers that they've used it, with nearly 15 million acknowledging use in the past month. That's a huge market - more Americans smoking pot than will buy a new car or truck this year.

    U.S. policies are based on the fantasy that we can somehow make this industry go away, but prohibition hasn't stopped marijuana use. Indeed, federal statistics show a roughly 4,000 percent rise since the first national ban took effect in 1937. We've simply handed a virtual monopoly on production and distribution to criminals, including those brutal Mexican gangs.

    The solution is obvious. After all, there's a reason these gangs aren't smuggling wine grapes. Prohibition simply doesn't work - not in the 1930s and not now.

    End prohibition, and our marijuana industry could start to look like California's wine business: A responsible industry that adds to the state's prestige, tourism and tax coffers, rather than a source of violence and instability.

    Aaron Houston is director of government relations for the Marijuana Policy Project, www.mpp.org. This column is adapted from a piece that first appeared on www.ForeignPolicy.com.

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Medicinal marijuana no laughing matter

    Clarence Page • April 5, 2009

    For all of the keen intellect President Barack Obama showed in his online "town hall" meeting, he didn't seem to know much about reefer economics.

    When asked whether legalizing marijuana might be a stimulus for the economy and job creation, he played the question for laughs.

    "I don't know what this says about the online audience," he quipped as his studio audience chuckled and groaned. "But ... this was a fairly popular question. We want to make sure that it was answered," he said.

    Sure. So you could knock it.

    "The answer is, 'no, I don't think that is a good strategy to grow our economy.' "

    No stimulus? Hey, more than a few blinged-out, Escalade-driving pot dealers would dispute that notion. You want "green" industry? Free the weed, dude.

    Such is the call of pro-pot politicians such as California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, who has proposed to legalize the weed, tax it and regulate it like booze. He estimates the move would generate $1 billion in revenue for the state's troubled budget and save $150 million in enforcement costs.

    It's hard to argue with Ammiano's logic, but it's easy to make light of lighting up. Marijuana is, after all, funny. Few subjects inspire more bad puns from headline writers than those that, well, step on grass. A quick sample:

    "Obama: Nope to dope." (Russia Today).

    "Obama's Marijuana Buzz Kill." (The Daily Beast online).

    "Marijuana issue suddenly smoking hot." (Politico).

    Like sex and sobriety, marijuana is funny because it is surrounded by so much hypocrisy. So is politics.

    To listen to Obama's chortles, for example, you'd never guess he is our third president in a row to have admitted to using marijuana back in his years of youthful indiscretion.

    Bill Clinton says he tried it but "didn't inhale." Oh, sure. George W. Bush admitted to early pot use in a taped interview with a friend, but refuses to discuss it in public. Obama described his own teen drug use in poignant detail in his first memoir, but like countless other boomer dads now shies shyly away from the subject.

    (2 of 2)

    Yet you would not guess from his snarky town-hall attitude that only a week earlier his Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the federal Drug Enforcement Administration would stop raiding and arresting users or dispensers of medicinal marijuana unless they violated both state law and federal law.

    Advertisement

    That means you, California, and a dozen other states that allow marijuana sales and possession for medicinal purposes with a doctor's recommendation.

    Holder sensibly announced that DEA resources are too valuable in the war against dangerous drug lords to be raiding residents who otherwise are in compliance with state and local laws and standards. That would reverse the Bush administration's ridiculous scorched-earth pursuit that ignored the right of states to govern themselves in such matters.

    Caught between laws

    Yet convenient inconsistency is not limited to any one party or administration. A week after Holder's notice - and the day before Obama laughed off the notion of legal reefers - DEA agents raided Emmalyn's California Cannabis Clinic, a licensed medical marijuana collective in San Francisco.

    DEA spokesmen claimed Emmalyn's had violated local as well as federal law, but they didn't say how. Local officials said they didn't have a clue what the DEA was talking about.

    Not laughing is Charles Lynch, a celebrated cause since his Morro Bay, Calif., medical marijuana dispensary was raided by the DEA in 2007. Two days before Obama's town hall, a federal judge postponed Lynch's sentencing to await clarification of Team Obama's new hands-off approach.

    Lynch, who has no criminal record and was welcomed by the local mayor and business community, should be set free. Instead he's in legal limbo, with both sides trying to make him a test case for their competing crusades.

    Also not laughing are lawmakers in at least 10 states, including Obama's home state of Illinois, who are debating whether and how they might join the 13 states where medical marijuana is legal.

    If he really cares, Obama could end this reefer madness in much the same way Franklin Roosevelt ended the disastrous run of liquor prohibition in 1933. Prohibition had to go. It was too costly to enforce. It demoralized a public already beaten down by the Depression. It wasted a potential tax revenue-producing commodity by intruding unnecessarily into private lives of otherwise law-abiding Americans. Sounds familiar.

    Unlike Roosevelt, President Obama does not have to amend the Constitution to end our current marijuana confusion. He only has to get out of the way and allow the states to enforce their own drug laws. That's not a laughable notion. It's only sensible.

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    The War on Drugs is No Laughing Matter

    It's time for Barack Obama to take legalization seriously

    Terry Michael | March 27, 2009

    Alcohol did not create Al Capone's gang violence in the hometown of our current president. Prohibition did. (highlighting for Homerovah)
    Marijuana does not create murderous drug cartels in Mexico. America's War on Drugs does.

    Surely President Barack Obama, one of the smartest men to inhabit the White House, must understand that truth—even if he chooses to laugh-off those of us who want to get serious about the need to end the social insanity of neo-Prohibition by legalizing marijuana and other psychoactive chemicals.

    French essayist Georges Bernanos wrote, "The worst, the most corrupting of lies, are problems poorly stated." It is an outrageous lie, one that corrupts intelligent public policy discourse, when we talk of "drug violence." The official corruption and murderous mayhem in both Mexico and on our side of the border are not a result of dried leafy vegetation and white powder. They are the consequence of a lucrative black market, spawning profits for which bad people are willing to kill and die, directly resulting from federal and state laws that prohibit the sale, use, and possession of drugs.

    As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton acknowledged in Mexico City, this lucrative marketplace is fed by human demand for altered consciousness as insatiable as that which President Obama felt when he regularly sought a nicotine fix, or which George W. Bush experienced when he reached for another bottle of beer. But our leaders weren't thrown in jail for smoking and drinking, and neither were their dealers at the corner convenience store and neighborhood bar.

    President Obama promised an end to politics as usual, but he now stands in the way of a long-neglected debate about ending the harm creation of draconian policies which: infringe on individual liberty; rip apart neighbor nations; create government violence against our own people by militarized police forces; cause health harm to the young by forcing psycho-active drugs underground, with no regulation of their content, purity, and strength, or education about how to use them intelligently; promote disrespect for the rule of law, with unequal penalties applied to the rich and to the poor—all factors which have disgracefully transformed the United States of America into the world's number one jailer.

    Our government's own research (a 2006 survey by the Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services) reveals that over half of the adult population of America has, at one time, used a controlled substance. Which means—if our drug laws were equally applied—that over 125 million of us would have spent time in jail, as Barack Obama and George W. Bush themselves would have done for what we euphemistically and absurdly call "youthful indiscretions." Obama has admitted using marijuana and cocaine. Bush, who was less candid, simply refused to deny it.

    It is understandable why politicians have convinced themselves that drugs are a third rail of public policy and that they therefore don't have to seriously address legalization. The media—the very institution charged by the First Amendment with facilitating intelligent discourse—colludes with the government's drug war rather than challenging politicians to engage a real debate. The Washington Post and The New York Times both require drug-tests from college students seeking summer internships. And both have given the federal government free advertising space to promote First Amendment-infringing drug policy, when the president's Office of Drug Control Policy acquires space for drug war propaganda. Would the Times and the Post ever alcohol-test an aging copy editor, or offer the Department of Defense free space to promote an elective war in the Middle East in return for a full-page ad touting "Mission Accomplished?"

    In this time of national economic crisis, we keep looking in our collective rear view mirror for lessons from the 1930s for what we should do, and what we should avoid, in order to restore confidence in ourselves and create hope for our future.

    While fiscal and monetary actions taken in that era offer mixed and muddled messages for today's policymakers, another action by a transformational leader in that far-off decade sends a clarion call to us at the beginning of the 21st Century.

    Franklin Roosevelt supported the 21st Amendment to end the madness of the 18th, and in so doing halted the devastating social, economic, and cultural costs of Prohibition. That's a lesson Barack Obama needs to heed.

    Terry Michael is Director of the Washington Center for Politics & Journalism and a former press secretary for the Democratic National Committee. He publishes "thoughts from a libertarian Democrat" at www.terrymichael.net.

  • purplesofa
    purplesofa

    When I finished my testimony, a local police chief, a member of the committee, angrily accused me of disrespecting the police officers in the room--who'd shown up in force, in uniform, to oppose medical marijuana. Wearing a bright yellow tie with the lettering "Police Line, Do Not Cross," the chief charged me with placing more stock in the opinions of doctors than of Minnesota's cops. Guilty, as charged. Who are we, I asked him, to substitute our judgment for that of medical professionals and their patients? Who are we, for that matter, to deny the will of the people.

    The courts are letting people decide to die for refusal of a blood transfusion even minors if they are found mature to make their own decisions, but let someone that is sick and in pain smoke some pot in their dying days for comfort and this is what happens?

    purps

  • jeeprube
    jeeprube

    One of the best things we could do for our country is legalizing marijuana, and tax it.

    We would cut the prison population in half, end a major portion of drug violence, free our law enforcement organizations from costly anti-drug operations, create a massive new funding source for government programs like universal health care, the list goes on and on.

    It's time for America to get over the idea that we need to legislate morality. Keep your religion out of our politics.

  • keyser soze
    keyser soze

    It would stimulate the economy, too. Nothing like a late night trip to Wendy's after smoking a bowl. (Sorry. I just made a joke, and it's no laughing matter)

  • beksbks
    beksbks

    Macaroni and cheese and canned chili sales would soar!!

  • watson
    watson

    Jack in the Box Jumbo Tacos, oh yeah.

  • beksbks
    beksbks

    Ben and Jerry's Cherry Garcia!! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!

    Whooooo!! Was it good for you Watson?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit