Article: France declares war on Sect influence in the United Nations-Includes JWs

by AndersonsInfo 5 Replies latest social current

  • AndersonsInfo
    AndersonsInfo

    http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/272841

    France declares war on Sect influence in the United Nations

    .


    France has a government agency called the Miviludes, unique in Western countries, whose job it is to track and counter those religious and other groups it considers as being sects. Miviludes is an acronym of the French phrase ‘Mission interministérielle de vigilance et de lutte contre les dérives sectaires, i.e. ‘Interministerial Mission for Monitoring and Combating Cultic Deviancy.’ A sect is defined here as being any religious organisation which can be characterised as employing any of the following methods;

    Mental destabilisation, exorbitant financial demands, a rupture with members’ original environment, power in the hands of one person, the invasion of a person’s physical integrity, the recruitment of children, antisocial preaching and troubling public order, activities which lead it to be tried in a court of law, using parallel economic structures, attempts to infiltrate the workplace, schools, and public powers.

    There are around fifty religions or groups which are being tracked, the most commonly known of which are; Jehovah’s Witnesses, Scientology, Mormons, The Universal Church, Raelians and The Unification Church (Moon.)

    Criticism of the Miviludes is fierce, and since the organisation began extending its activities to organisations outside of France it has also been attacked by foreign government agencies such as the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, which has in the past been highly sceptical about the motives of the Miviludes.

    Yesterday saw the release of their 199-page Annual Report, of which ten pages are consecrated to a stinging criticism of the activity of sects and their supporters in the UN and the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.) The OSCE is the biggest security-oriented intergovernmental organisation on the planet. Its job is to surveille and uphold principles such as fair elections, press freedom and human rights. It is an ad-hoc UN Agency.

    The report notably singles out NGO’s (Non-governmental organizations) which it says are attempting to legitimise sect activities under cover of the principles of religious freedom. They are said to be acting in concert to limit the influence of the Miviludes within the UN by using tactics such as official complaints and smear tactics.

    OSCE/UN services said to be particularly infiltrated are the Office of Democratic Institutions and that of Human Rights. Other major institutions said to be affected are the European Council and the US State Department and its Report on Religious Freedoms in the World.

    NGO’s said to be active in trying to destabilise the Mivilude’s work include Human Rights Without Frontiers, the Institute on Religion and Public Policy, the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty and the Information and Advice Centre for New Spititualities.

    These and other organisations are said to be acting as front organisations for various religions who do not have UN accredited presence. Most notable amongst them is the Church of Scientology, which has launched several attacks on the Miviludes, notably by using the US State Department’s clout at the UN. The Scientology Internet site logo looks very much like the UN logo and the Church presents itself as being ‘Associated with the UN Department of Public Information.’

    One week ago the Paris offices of the Miviludes were visited by OSCE officials demanding to audit the report before release and check it for what it called any possible human and religious rights abuse. The staff present refused that any documents be taken away. The OSCE intervention was applauded by the Church of Scientology which had appealed to the UN and OSCE in order that they surveille the activities of the Miviludes.

    The fact that France is a fiercely secular country provides a partial explanation for the existence of an organisation as unique and with as much influence as the Miviludes. It has been involved in long-running battles with various religious organisations, or sects as they call them. Now that this battle has moved onto the international stage the stakes have gone up and both sides are sharpening their knives.

  • Pistoff
    Pistoff

    Great find, thanks Barb.

    P

  • carla
    carla

    Thanks, marking

  • quietlyleaving
    quietlyleaving

    nice find barbara - reminded me of the fact that the open university in the UK has been awarded £407,000 to research religious conflict and its implications

    http://www3.open.ac.uk/media/fullstory.aspx?id=16135

    Professor Wolffe explains: "Had a research programme on ‘global uncertainties' been launched three hundred years ago, an explicit concern with the domestic and international security implications of conflict between Catholics and Protestants would undoubtedly have been very prominent. Even a hundred years ago there was still influential support for the view that the most significant source of confrontation within and between European states was religion.

    “While such a perception was eclipsed in the subsequent actual course of twentieth century history, in the context of its revival at the turn of the twenty-first century the longer term historical perspective merits closer examination. Moreover, local and regional tensions between Catholics and Protestants continue to be a matter of contemporary concern, especially in Ireland and the United States.

    “The project will explore the long term resolution of regional tensions between Catholics and Protestants to aid understanding and address other contemporary religious conflict. Most notably there will be comparison with the perceived 'clash of civilizations' between Christianity and Islam."

  • Narkissos
    Narkissos

    The French policy is actually less clear (or consistent) than it would appear from this article. In front of (and often weighing against) the Miviludes (which is an interministerial agency under the responsibility of the Prime Minister) there is the Ministry of Interior which is officially responsible for religious affairs and has shown so far much more tolerance to "cults," in what used to be the line of the current President (N. Sarkozy) when he was Minister of Interior. The political (and economical) weight of the U.S.A. (hence of the yearly Department of State Report which frowns upon any suspected infringement on "freedom of religion") is of course an important factor: a lenient attitude toward "cults" generally goes hand in hand with a general "Atlantist" or pro-American stance. To most observers Sarkozy has shown both, but the financial and economical crisis may change the deal and help him "repent".

    One particularly important issue here is strategical: listing movements as (at least, potentially) dangerous "cults" vs. concentrating on "cultic" features, trends or functionings no matter who displays them. The very name of the Miviludes (which targets dérives sectaires, "cultic drifts" or "deviancies" indicates a shift from the former to the latter. There was a bad experience in 1995 when the prototype agency released a list "cultic movements" (including JWs) which gave way to much protestation and probably some unfairness. But otoh the Miviludes (understandably) contends that to be efficient against "cultic drifts" one must be specific and name particular organisations, although on a reasonably factual basis ("victim" complaints, judicial suits, justice sentences, etc.). This is again the case in the report released this week -- although the Ministry of Interior is still very much opposed to it, as evidenced by a recent memo instructing prefects to focus police activities on reported transgressions of the law rather than trying to control particular organisations. The recent emphasis on "cultic drifts" in therapeutical (rather than openly religious) organisations (on which the Ministry of Interior has no particular control) may be a way to avoid the confrontation.

    Here is (to those who can read French) an interesting article from a leading newspaper on this topic: http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2009/05/19/faut-il-publier-la-liste-des-mouvements-sectaires_1195478_3224.html

  • StAnn
    StAnn

    "...antisocial preaching and troubling public order"

    So, anybody who protests at an abortion rally is now suspect? Anybody who protests at an execution is suspect? Any minister or priest who states that they believe practicing homosexuality is a sin is "antisocial"? This is a dangerous slippery slope, IMO.

    St. Ann

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit