by Spike Tassel 43 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
607 BCE is not how anyone at the time would have spoken of it, for starters. Actually, anything BCE is historically anachronistic.
So? The fact is that the entire teaching scheme of the WT relies on 607 BCE, and IT IS THE WRONG DATE! I mean talk about having egg on your face!
SO back to your theory of logical reasoning... If your date is proven wrong, how can you continue to put forth the teachings based upon it as truth? Doesn't that violate logic?
The contributors draw from their own spirits, whether ultimately from Jehovah or Satan, or a mix of both.
So the "contributors" as you call them can be inspired by Satan?
Beep, beep - let's back up the truck here.
Is the poster claiming that he actually has real first century writings of the New Testament in the Hebrew language? That these are reasonably proven to be the very oldest New Testament writings by scientific evaluation?
Is the poster claiming that these writings clearly contain the tetragrammaton?
I did not think so! ...so we are back to the broken WTS argument that in places where much later transcripts use Lord or God in quoting older Hebrew scriptures they were well within their rights to just arbitratily put "Jehovah" into their English "translation".
I UNDERSTAND THAT THE GOSPELS WERE WRITEN IN EITHER GREEK OR ARAMAIC
Spike I must say, you have the intellectual ability of a Jehovah's Witness!
we each draw our own personal conclusions based on the evidence before us
yet your evidence is not the word of God- it is the WT dogma.
on all of this Topic, I see no "WT dogma" in any of my statements
Ok...back on topic...
If the NT was originally written in Hebrew, wouldn't we expect to see Jesus uttering the Divine Name in his prayers?
Is there any verse in the Christian Scriptures where Jesus utters God's Name in one of his prayers?
on all of this Topic, I see no "WT dogma" in any of my statements
Even though your line of reasoning follows the WT's exactly?
