For those familiar with my postings already know, I am a Christian who is married to an active Jehovah's Witness (though not yet baptized). We discuss issues concerning the witnesses and their doctrines and have had "Bible Studies" with one of the elders. I've asked her about some of these things and I would like to share her responses and see if it lines up with Watchtower teachings.
Can a police officer become a Jehovah's Witness?
My wife and I passed a lot of state troopers on the way to the state fair in Richmond, VA and I told her that I had heard that police officers are not allowed to become witnesses. Her response, "Why not?" I said that I think it has something to do with them carrying a gun. She said, "If that is the case, Jehovah's Witnesses cannot be hunters either since hunters carry guns." So police officers can be Jehovah's Witnesses. "Sure they can," she said.
To the group I ask, is this true? Can police officers be Jehovah's Witnesses?
My follow up, "Can a Jehovah's Witness join the military?" "No they cannot," she replied. "Why not? Do they not carry guns also just like the police force?" Her reply, "The police force serves to protect the citizens. All the military is good for is killing people and destroying things." I replied, "What if another country tries to attack or invade us, our police officers would not be equiped to handle their military." Her response, "Well if no country had a military, we would not have to worry about war or anything like that and we would not need our military." My response, "Well according to that reasoning, if everyone was peaceful and law abiding, we would not need a police force either."
Conclusions: You can be a police officer or a hunter and be one of the Jehovah's Witnesses, but you cannot be in the military. According to my wife that is. But I thought the Watchtower did not allow neither police officers nor people in the military to become Jehovah's Witnesses.
My wife buys lottery tickets. I thought that too was not allowed by the society but I never say anything when she buys them.
The multiple choice questionaire...
One of the booths at the state fair was passing out questionaires asking people theological questions concerning salvation.
Question 1: I believe I am: a) a good person, b) a religious person, c) a sinner, d) too bad to get to heaven.
She picked A, the correct answer is C (we are all sinners for there is none righteous).
Question 2: Jesus Christ loves and cares for: a) good people, b) only people who attend church, c) sinners, d) only innocent children.
She picked B, the correct answer is C (Romans 5:8).
Question 3: To get to heaven you must: a) follow the Golden Rule or obey the Ten Commandments, b) do good, be water baptized, attend church, c) ask Jesus into your heart, d) do nothing -- there is no hell.
This question I will admit is tricky for a witness since most believe they are not going to Heaven and of course she did make this point. All Jehovah's Witnesses also believe in no literal hell (mentioned in choice d). For Christians, the correct answer is C (John 3:16). She ultimately said all of the above which certainly illustrates the need for a witness to keep working to obtain his or her salvation (a), get baptized and attend all meetings (b), believe in the ransom sacrifice of Jesus (c), and (leaving out the 'do nothing' part) deny the teaching of hell fire (d).
Question 4: Jesus Christ is: a) one of several great teachers, b) someone to imitate as a way to heaven, c) the only way to heaven, d) a myth.
I forgot her answer but since she did not believe she is going to heaven I don't think B and C were her choices. For Christians the correct answer is C (John 14:6).
Question 5: If we do not believe in Jesus Christ we can: a) do good and hope for the best, b) believe in a mystical, higher power, c) be sure we will go to hell, d) believe in Muhammed, Buddha, or the Pope.
I don't recall her answer but again since witnesses do not believe in hell, the correct answer of C would make no sense to them.
The talk on idolatry...
Apparently the Kingdom Hall had a talk today concerning idolatry. The usual line up of idols: the cross, money, and sports. Christians worship the cross, sports fanatics will attend games and even miss their meetings to attend them, and people go after the almighty dollar and not put Kingdom interest first.
My main point of contention was the cross. So Christians worship the cross, I've never seen anyone call a cross God and do acts of worship to it. I've seen people in church come to an altar (which may or may not have a cross displayed above it) and pray on their hands and knees to God, but are they worshipping the altar? If so, then are children and adults who pray on their knees beside their beds at night worshipping their beds? She said, "Well you know people would carry crosses around as if it is their 'good luck' charm." Okay, I will agree that neither the cross or any other symbol has power to bring good fortunes (like the way one mail order company was selling the 'Our Lady of Medjugorje' charm or the 'Rub the Buddha for Money' charm). I also agree that God is not to be found in a building or an image. The Bible says that 'whereever two or more are gathered together', God is there with us.
Then I asked her to not take offense to what I was about to say next but I've noted that whenever I disagree with a Watchtower teaching I am either trying to 'disprove the Bible' or 'disprove God.' I told her that I try to live my life in accords with the Bible and believe in God. However, at what point did the Watchtower get to be exalted to God? "The Watchtower follows the Bible as closely as they can and the Bible is inspired by God," she says, "Therefore if you disagree with the Watchtower, you disagree with God." "Is that so?", I asked, "Then how come the Watchtower changes its teachings so often. As we saw at the booth at the State Fair, God cannot change, so how come the Watchtower changes?" "It is all new light and them refining their teachings," she replied. I followed up with, "If the Watchtower teaches that one can get blood transfusion, then teach that blood transfusions are not allowed, then later says allows for blood fractions, it is all new light? How can new light contradict old light? If the Watchtower teaches that immunizations are not allowed, then teach that they are, how can this be? How can the Watchtower teach that organ transplants are not allowed (cannibalism) then later allow them? These are opposing teachings and they can't both be true, so either the Watchtower is teaching false teachings now or was teaching false teachings then, which one is it? If the Watchtower is God's sole channel on the Earth, how can their teachings change so much if God cannot change?"
Silence...
So tell me something, by equating disagreements with the Watchtower to being disagreements with God, does this not sound like some form of idolatry?
She disagrees but of course at this point she thinks I am 'once again' misguided and trying to disprove the Bible and reject God.