by Lady Liberty 13 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
"big problem with this astronomy ai that the records of their observations are subject to interpretation"
Hey scholar!
And the WTS reasoning is devoid of any need for interpretation? You live in a very peculiar world.... scales before your eyes... rose coloured glasses .... etc,...
Wha
Traitor to the truth.
Avashai
How so?
S
Scholar, we do place our trust in the infallible words of God- which is how we know 607BCE is impossible, as opposed to those incompetent WT 'scholars', oops I mean clowns.
In Carl's book, the Gentile times reconsidered, he points out multiple lines of evidence in to show that the 607 date is incorrect.
Secular and biblical evidence and LOTS of it.
Fact is, all the info that Carl puts out has backing from secular AND biblical authorities, the WT doctrine has neither.
Babylonian dating and record keeping in the Neo-Babylonian era was excellent, that is a fact.
