I have been to many different sites in the last four years regarding religion. I find it amusing that when a leader or founder of a movement takes upon the role of someone who speaks for God, and then what the founder said as "supposed" truth from God fails, they back peddle and try to give new meaning to what was really meant to begin with.
I myself look at Charles Taze Russell (Bible Students), Joseph Smith (LDS), Ellen G. White (Adventists), and others that took upon themselves as spokesmen for God, as false prophets according to Deutoronomy 18:20-22.
Of course those that follow such movements will at times say that what was said by the leaders actually happened in a way different than what was actually intended, when actually it was a clear failure as to what was supposed to take place according to the founder or leader of the movement.
I would be interested in opinions as to what anyone believes what a false prophet is to them.
Just because someone does not come out and say: I AM A PROPHET FOR GOD, does not excuse them (IMO) from the failures they spoke and mislead people with.
What are your opinions.