Cold Steel, they may not have the same resources the Party had in 1984, but their mindset is just the same.
I have the impression that we have a troll here. For someone who bothered to read Bangalore's post and actually took the time to write something, you are either in absolute ignorance of the ways of the organization, or you want to pick up a fight. I won't do as you seem to want. I will use argumentation. If you're a troll or an active Jehovah's witness who is trying to use "theocratic warfare", well, the more, the merrier.
You wrote:
It doesn't have it's own police force, it doesn't have the ability to enforce any of its laws and edicts nor does it claim any inspiration of God. So what that there's a little grooming advice? So what that it sounds as though it were written for a low-grade idiot? These people have magazines with space that have to be filled up.
The organization does not have a Police force like a government would. But it does have groups of elders who DO enforce their own "laws and edicts". I wonder if you have taken the time to read the site. It's full of people who were submitted to "the laws and edicts" of the organization, as in "disfellowshipped". People are disfellowshipped in what the organization itself calls "Judiciary committees". Maybe the organization does not claim to be inspired by God, in the sense that it claims to be "GOD'S organization", and claims to be led by God himself. One of the many ways in which Crisis of Conscience is important lies in the fact that one of the men who ruled the organization tells it like it is: no God, only a group of guys making decisions like any other Board would, only this time over very important matters, such as, for example, people taking a blood transfusion.
Jehovah's witnesses are not "morons" or "low-grade idiots". They have been led to believe in something that I consider to be a lie. Many former ex-JW's think the organization is a lie, too. The witnesses aren't simply told how to dress. They are told even how much time they should devote to working, and how they should be doing it.
I see you believe that it's always the people who are to blame for what the leaders do. Since we're talking about 1984, and its relation to Socialism, can you tell me why the hell the Chinese don't overthrow their government? North-Koreans? Cubans? Why is it that the Iranians don' t overthrown their government? Why is is that so many Moslem women consent to their daughters's genitalia being mutilated? Is it because they give power to their rulers, and they don't seem to have the whim of withdrawing that power from the leaders?
Can you tell me more about this, please?