I really don't see the issue with JW baptism. Personally I think it's better than how other religions do it.
You could have been a baby being baptised into the church. Then when you were 10 went through classes became confirmed ands start partaking communion because mom n dad wanted you to. How is that any different?
----------------------
JW Baptism is different because of the penalties applied to it.
A baptized JW can be disfellowshipped and thereby shunned - a non baptized JW cannot. So in essence, if a non baptized JW commits adultery and is not repentent, he'll simply be counselled and maybe lose some privilege; the baptized JW who commits adultery and is not repentent will be disfellowshipped. (By the way this is just an example of a crime but it could be anything). A non baptized JW who spouts the same apostate stuff as a baptized JW again, will not suffer shunning as will the disfellowshipped person.
Two sets of rules for everyone sitting in the KH so it is always better to remain unbaptized - I'm sure God would understand that allegiance should never be to a corporation.
The WTS is a one way door and sadly, people are trapped once baptized...and that is distinctly unlike the majority of other religions. That vast 'other' majority, do not shun their members, do not track them down and denounce them publicly and divide loyalties and families. There is nothing good about JW baptism and because of the severe punishment meted out to those baptized ones, it should not even be allowed within the congregations until one has reached adulthood - preferably around mid twenties at the very least. sammieswife.