Physicist Michio Kaku on God.

by Deputy Dog 25 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  Deputy Dog

  frankie

  What I'm saying is that we(as in You and I) don't know the accumulated knowledge of what science has uncovered up to date and thatthey are working on a theory of everything this is no idol boast or statement but explains how everything came to be they think it should be beautiful mathematically speaking not ugly like quantum mechanics any way here is a little about it;

  I think I understand you perferctly. What I'm suggesting is "How would "they" (who ever "they" are) know about (or be aware of) what they don't know?

  Wouldn't it be better to call it, The theory of everything known.
• 

  frankiespeakin

  DD,

  The theory of everything has to do with how everthing came into existence(our universe), not the explaination of every single thing knowable to a mythological Deity.
• 

  Deputy Dog

  frankie

  The theory of everything has to do with how everthing came into existence(our universe),...

  So lets get this straight. "They" are going to pose a theory to explain everything in existence (in our universe), when we don't know of everything that exists in our universe. Most of which we can't see and probably can't know. Hmmmm

  If string theory is true, What about things that only exist in other universes?
• 

  frankiespeakin

  DD,

  If string theory is true, What about things that only exist in other universes?

  We will have to wait on that they need to conduct more experients with super colliders like the LHC

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

  Purpose

  A simulated event in the CMS detector, featuring the appearance of the Higgs boson.

  Physicists hope that the LHC will help answer the most fundamental questions in physics, questions concerning the basic laws governing the interactions and forces among the elementary objects, the deep structure of space and time, especially regarding the intersection of quantum mechanics and general relativity, where current theories and knowledge are unclear or break down altogether. These issues include, at least: [ 11 ]

  • Is the Higgs mechanism for generating elementary particlemasses via electroweaksymmetry breaking indeed realised in nature? [ 12 ] It is anticipated that the collider will either demonstrate (or rule out) the existence of the elusive Higgs boson(s), completing (or refuting) the Standard Model. [ 13 ] [ 14 ] [ 15 ]
  • Is supersymmetry, an extension of the Standard Model and Poincaré symmetry , realised in nature, implying that all known particles have supersymmetric partners? [ 16 ] [ 17 ] [ 18 ] These may clear up the mystery of dark matter.
  • Are there extra dimensions, [ 19 ] as predicted by various models inspired by string theory, and can we detect them?

  Other questions are:

  • Are electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force just different manifestations of a single unified force, as predicted by various Grand Unification Theories?
  • Why is gravity so many orders of magnitude weaker than the other three fundamental forces? See also Hierarchy problem.
  • Are there additional sources of quarkflavours, beyond those already predicted within the Standard Model?
  • Why are there apparent violations of the symmetry between matter and antimatter? See also CP violation.
  • What was the nature of the quark-gluon plasma in the early universe? This will be investigated by ion collisions in ALICE.
• 

  Deputy Dog

  Quarkflavours?

  I'll bet they taste like chicken.
• 

  Satanus

  If it quarks like a chicken, it must be chicken.

  S