GENETICS- CREATIONISTS need not be INTIMIDATED.
Internet Evolutionists almost universally and repetitiously proclaim that modern neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory is supported by “overwhelming evidence” and that there is “no evidence” for Biblical creation (or even mere intelligent design) for that matter. They will dogmatically claim that evolution receives universal support from “all the real scientists” and “all the facts” from genetics, biology, geology, paleontology, and every other “ology” that one can think of.
I think that the situation actually somewhat different. Now, I’m not claiming that the following genetics specific resources “prove the Bible” or even that they “disprove evolution”. But they do show that the evolutionary dogmatist claims like the above are well . . . dogmatist claims, - and that creationists need not necessarily be intimidated by them.
“Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Human Genome” (second edition), available from http://www.creationresearch.org
“Dr. Sanford’s popular book explores the limitations of evolution’s primary axiom. This axiom is the evolutionary change (i.e., common descent) is accomplished by a combination of natural selection and random mutations. Using modern genetics research, the former Cornell University scientist provides several challenges to this axiom. Organisms, including humans, are declining in health, not evolving to more advanced stages of evolution. This newest edition contains the addition of a glossary, index, and author’s notes.”
This is the best recent book for “extincting” neo-Darwinian theory by showing that the deleterious mutation rates are vastly higher than evolution can allow for. Evolutionists admit that the deleterious mutation rate needs to be less (much less in reality) then 1 deleterious mutation on average per individual per generation - otherwise genetic degradation and extinction is inevitable. Contains shocking appendix documenting this from recent top evolutionary journals. Written by a very prominent geneticist. Highly damaging.
This is also the best book available for an easily understandable explanation of other issues as to the absurdity of neo-Darwinism as our "creator". Very enlightning.
A DVD is also available. See also: http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_1/j21_1_43-47.pdf -
The book “The Biotic Message”. http://saintpaulscience.com/contents.htm
Though not a biblical creationist book this is still a very informative and (though technical) resource providing information on how evolutionists developed their genetic models and the SEVERE remaining problems. For example gives the history on why evolutionists came up with the (now falsified) claim that 99% of DNA is “junk”. (This was not based on observation, but instead on what would be needed to “save” evolution in light of the high observed rates of mutation). Other evolutionists (possibly unaware) later parroted this “ 99% junk” DNA claim as “evidence” against a designer, when in reality it was a figure calculated to bring the effective deleterious mutation rate down by a factor of a hundred to push it to less then one per individual per generation to “save” evolution.
The book also shows that regardless of the deleterious mutation rates, that the substitution rate of beneficial mutations into a population with long generation times i.e. humans, is so vastly slow that only a negligible amount of beneficial evolution (only a few hundred nucleotides) could occur even over the evolutionists own time frame . This was discovered a long time ago by a very prominent evolutionist and was never solved. "In my opinion the [Haldane's Dilemma] problem was never solved, by Wallace or anyone else."George C. Williams, a highly respected evolutionary geneticist, 1992,
in his book, Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges, p 143-144
http://saintpaulscience.com/Haldane.htm
The book also offers an excellent treatment of problems with a naturalistic origin of life and the genetic code. Responses are given to evolutionists attempts to defeat probability calculations. (Also available from the Creation Research Society)
Article:
“Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism”
http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_3/j21_3_111-117.pdf
Article:
“Mitochondrial eve and the biblical Eve are looking good: criticism of young age premature”
http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j19_1/j19_1_57-59.pdf
Some responses to Evolutionists claims on things like junk DNA, Endogenous Retroviruses, Chromosome fusion, etc.
http://www.detectingdesign.com/pseudogenes.html
A WARNING: Many internet evolutionists will frequently try to suppress the reading of any materials against their generally secular, evoltionary naturalist, worldview. They will often dismissively “review” books without even reading them, or search and link you to other “reviews” by other evolutionists who have never really read them. They will often immediately parrot any counter article on the internet without doing virtually any research, and dogmatically claim that the anti-evolutionary claims have thusly been “refuted”. They will also ad hominen the writers. They will appeal to the fact that any referenced evolutionary geneticists still “believe” in evolution, and claim that therefore it is wrong to cite them (even for specific technical points). Even if the anti-evolutionary article has been written and reviewed by qualified scientists (and even though it may document many of its technical point from even evolutionary technical literature), they will still proclaim that the explicit anti-evolutionary article is invalid since it has not been both peer-reviewed and published by editing evolutionist bodies in their evolutionary science journals.