Threat of 1980 Rebellion/Schism--Real or Perceived?

by neverendingjourney 34 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  neverendingjourney

  The way Crisis of Conscience lays it out, despite their reservations on doctrine, Ray Franz and Ed Dunlap would have been more than happy to live out their lives within the JW ranks without causing any disturbance. Ray was contemplating resigning from the GB and living out his life quietly somewhere outside Bethel. Ed preferred to remain in Bethel due to his advanced age. Neither sought to express their reservations about JW doctrine to anyone outside of their tight-knit circle. Starting a new religion certainly was out of the question.

  Ray Franz took a leave of absence early in 1980 and all hell broke loose. Within a matter of weeks several high-ranking Bethelites had been disfellowshipped for apostasy. Ray then became the subject of the inquisition and was asked to resign from the GB and leave Bethel. The wheels were put in motion, however, and shortly thereafter Ray was excommunicated...for sharing a meal with his employer who had recently disassociated himself from the JWs.

  If the events occurred just as Ray describes, the Society's actions were completely illogical, not to mention irrational. The way in which Ray was treated led him to write the only exposé of the inner workings of the governing body ever published.

  It seems the shrewder move would have been to keep these men in Bethel where they could be monitored. The GB could have sent the loyalty-above-all message simply by stripping these men of their authority.

  The Society’s actions only make sense if the threat of a schism was real. No doubt they took muscular preemptive action against the perceived threat, but what prompted this response? From what I can tell, rumors began to circulate about disagreements Ray and Ed had with WT doctrine, but this was nothing new. As Ray points out, Albert Schroeder had been taken to task a few years earlier for presenting a different view on “this generation” from the platform.

  Unless there’s something more to the story, the Watchtower’s actions were completely irrational, illogical, and ultimately counterproductive. If Ray were still a JW (as was apparently his wish), we’d have no Crisis of Conscience. None of us would know that doctrinal changes require a 2/3 supermajority. We’d be left to speculate about the nature of GB meetings that the manner in which they’re carried out. The WT shot itself in the foot, and for the life of me I can’t figure our why.

  Is there more to the story? Was the threat of a rebellion, schism, apostasy, or whatever else you want to call it real ?
• 

  No Apologies

  You're assuming that the WT leaders were rational people... What are you basing this on?

  No Apologies
• 

  Think About It

  "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer."- Sun-Tzu (Chinese general & military strategist ~400 BC)

  Think About It
• 

  neverendingjourney

  You're assuming that the WT leaders were rational people... What are you basing this on?

  I don't assume WT leaders are rational. One potential answer is simply this: the men on the GB are completely irrational and acted accordingly.

  Why did Nixon have his goons break into the Watergate Hotel when his reelection bid was never seriously challenged? Because he was paranoid and irrational. Why did McCarthy initiate a witch hunt against "communist sympathizers"? Because he was irrational, power-hungry, and an attention whore.

  Another possible answer, however, is that the GB began to sense their grip of power slipping away and decided to bring the hammer down. Private conversations revealing doubts about official JW doctrine don't seem to justify such a response.

  My interest is in trying to figure out whether there is more information out there from other sources that substantiate the latter explanation or whether the former is all there is to it.
• 

  diamondiiz

  COC is a great book but it doesn't reveal that much new material that you couldn't find outside of it. After a bit of research it doesn't take a genius to see that GB isn't inspired by anything other than their combined uneducated dumbness. The GB like other cult leaders are after total control and obediance from each other and their flock. Any one questioning them will be the target and that was Ray's and others outcome. They feel too high and mighty to reason that their actions may bite them in the ass later. After all, 1975 BS blew up in their faces but the cult didn't fall apart and the blame went on suckers who put trust in the leaders while the leaders were free of any guilt - surely that helped their ego that they could push out even one of their own without feeling threatened.
• 

  ldrnomo

  The WTS are experts at shooting themselves in the foot. They fall in a tulip field and come out smelling like sh!t.

  LD
• 

  leavingwt

  Unless there’s something more to the story, the Watchtower’s actions were completely irrational, illogical, and ultimately counterproductive.

  They really do think God is running the organization. As such, trying to explain things in a rational way is not productive, IMHO.

  Ray would not OBEY. He would not go along with leadership. As such, the 'rules' demanded that he be punished.
• 

  leavingwt

  COC is a great book but it doesn't reveal that much new material that you couldn't find outside of it.

  Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence.

  Please point us to a book/source that provides details of GB meetings.

  Waiting. . . . . . . . . .
• 

  diamondiiz

  Leavingwt:

  COC dealt with much more than just GB meetings.

  Is GB more worried about what one man says about their secret meetings or flood of evidence presented about their scandels and doctrinal changes? Much of the book deals with doctrine and history and how it afected Ray and few others which is a stronger part of the book IMO than GB meetings, wouldn't you say? But most of that historical evidence can be researched outside of the book which is what I meant and not that I implying there was nothing new to be found in Ray's book.
• 

  feenx

  I agree with leavingwt.....

  IMHO it's quite clear that dubs pretty much think they're invincible. Which is ironic since they preach so hard that at the time of the end all will undergo persecution. So of course ANYTIME a dub is "persecuted" (which is really more like someone calling one on their sh*t) it's a clear sign of the times. But in all reality they walk as if on water themselves. They're so convinced they can't be touched that I wouldn't be surprised if none of them ever gave it a second thought. I'm sure they just wanted this "apostate" and unclean "thing" away from them. They also know that word spreads fast in the org., so the longer there is no action, the more talk there will be, which means more work for them to contain it. So the easy thing is to simply cast him out. And because each and every high ranking member of the org is clearly genius material, I am positive the thought that Ray Franz would write a book about his experiences, at all, was preposterous. Let alone that this book would actually get the attention and readership that it has over the years was probably inconceivable to them.