That is a sensationalist title for an article - such rhetorical fallacy. What does "proof for the Bible" mean. That suddenly we know beyond doubt that it is inerrant and inspired. It is of little relevance that a book can be correct from an Archaeological or historical perspective. I am well aware that much of the Bible has been discredited historically, but even if every word regarding times and places was 100% correct, it would not "prove" the Bible - whatever such a term is supposed to mean.
Elsewhere - Another Cult will rise proving that the Wizard of Oz in Australia not the US