V interesting thread C Scienza. I agree that the WTS will try and protect themselves from possible threats and therefore use trust mechanisms to do so. Of course they will also use every means possible to reduce their tax liabilities which adds weight to this. The process to move funds between companies via invoicing is such standard practice too - tax avoidance a strong reason or shifting profits around.
Just because an organisation is non-profit making or a charity does not mean they aren't creaming off significant sums via simple invoicing to other companies - not necessarily WTS related. The people who will know this are the admin staff - has anyone worked in the interco accounting or billing sections of WTS? Anyone dealt with processing invoices with generic descriptions like "management or consulting fees"? Also what governance is in place - who signs these off?
In terms of the WTS being run like a business - get real - clearly it has to and would have folded half a century ago if not. I don't dispute there is a conflict with telling members the end of the world is nigh and then making long term strategic & financial plans for WTS - but history will have told them that you have to plan for the future. (ok ok I know that sounds opposite to every PT... store treasures in heaven and forget your pension). How could you manage printing & distribution of so many books/mags without detailed long term cashflow forecasts. I imagine their more recent strategies of KH consolidation (that I've read on this site) are a result of their long term planning and an effort to squeeze significant efficiencies to offset a potential drop in contributions.
The sale of Brooklyn is in my humble opinion going to be the big series of transactions to watch. How will they spread the risk of these proceeds - who decides what goes where and who signs it off.
As for the WTS being a money making tree - I would be interested to understand your model in more detail C Scienza. At a high level it has been fairly successful albeit they've gone about it in a rubbish way especially in terms of maximising wealth (gets it's members give up their source of income and also gives away free literature).
There have been plenty of local money scandals in congregations - I recall one elder in a neighbouring cong took nearly £50k from the KH fund to "keep his wife happy" (although no-one could ever make that miserable cow happy) - but have there been any huge misappropriations of funds from the WTS - not necessarily by the top brass - but people who have access to it? Don't think there'll be criminal cases as I doubt if the WTS would have pressed for charges due to bad publicity - both in bringing Jah's name into it and don't want to send message to rank & file that their contributions aren't being protected.
MMXIV