Question From Readers reveals dependent state of JWs

by sd-7 35 Replies latest jw friends

  • sd-7
    sd-7

    Just consider some of the questions I found, not worrying about the responses:

    ***w50 12/1 p.496 Questions From Readers***

    In view of what Deuteronomy 4:15-23 has to say about the making of any graven image, would it be considered Scripturally correct
    to make photographs of individuals for display purposes of any sort, or for other uses?—P.S.,Indiana.

    ***w50 12/15 p.522 Questions From Readers***

    Does Jeremiah 10:3-5 refer to the erection and trimming of Christmas trees?—C.M.,Washington.

    Since our song book, our prayers, our new Bible, etc., are doing away with archaic expressions,
    what about the word brethren?—H.K.,Nebraska.

    ***w51 3/15 p.191 Questions From Readers***

    In our company of Jehovah’s witnesses there are some who go to motion picture shows, football games, etc., for entertainment,
    and there are others who do not go and who criticize those who do. Is it wrong to indulge in such recreation?—R.H.,Florida.

    ***w51 3/15 p.192 Questions From Readers***

    When I was in an orthodox church the minister forbade picture shows, and I vowed never to go to one. Since I have now come into
    the truth, am I still bound by that vow, and would it be wrong to go to a show occasionally?—H.M.,Canada.

    ***w60 9/15 p.576 Questions From Readers***

    Is it proper for a Christian to carry life insurance? Is it not a form of gambling?—S.P.,U.S.A.

    Taking pictures. Use of the word "brethren" (and as you can see, old terminology was being shifted out 60 years ago in the 'updated' song book even as it is now). Getting life insurance. Going to a football game or a theater. There were individuals--adults--who felt so concerned about these decisions that they felt a need to write to the Watchtower Society for advice.

    I'm pretty sure this is what Raymond Franz must have observed in his time on the Governing Body, as he wrote about his concerns in Crisis of Conscience. What we have in a situation like this is people who have been reduced to the state of dependent children, incapable of making even basic decisions without consulting, as it was called back then (whether or not that was done merely in the literature or in general, I don't know), 'the mother organization'.

    Is this what spiritual maturity is supposed to bring? I would be very saddened if people in my flock were writing about things like this. But the Society doesn't express that kind of concern. If anything, it nurtures this dependent behavior and even demands it. Granted, not everyone would write to the Society about things like this. But I would think that a measure of fear has to be involved in such questions as well. Fear, as in an abusive relationship--if you're not sure what will earn you another beating, you're probably going to ask for permission for everything, once you've been beaten into full submission.

    I understand that sometimes we all need advice. But is it possible that there's something not right about this? Just wanted to ask.

    --sd-7

  • JWoods
    JWoods

    Dependent, yes they are. And every bit this dumb.

    But I have always had serious doubts if these "questions from readers" were not really just made-up fakes by the writers at Brooklyn.

  • sd-7
    sd-7

    Since our song book, our prayers, our new Bible, etc., are doing away with archaic expressions,
    what about the word brethren?—H.K.,Nebraska.

    --Jan. 1st, 1951, page 31, Questions From Readers. Sorry about the format....

  • sd-7
    sd-7

    Hmm. Good point, JWoods. You're not like, THE James Woods, are you--you know, the actor with that distinctive voice? 'Cause if you are, I loved you as Owlman in 'Justice League: Crisis on Two Earths'!

  • Terry
    Terry

    I remember getting the outline to an hour talk I was to deliver one Sunday. It was about Conscience. Christian Conscience.

    The bulk of the talk was how you couldn't trust your conscience unless and untill the Society had programmed it with automatic

    responses!

    They should have called it Christian Brainwashing. Not a whole lot of difference.

    There is an old Chinese proverb. If you give a man a fish you feed him for a day. If you teach a man to fish you feed him for a lifetime.

    I guess you could say the Watchtower wants only to give the man a fish.

  • JWoods
    JWoods
    Hmm. Good point, JWoods. You're not like, THE James Woods, are you--you know, the actor with that distinctive voice? 'Cause if you are, I loved you as Owlman in 'Justice League: Crisis on Two Earths'!

    No, I am better-looking than James Woods the actor. Also I am not jewish and would never play a mad-dog killer in the movies! Seriously, I think I remember Ed Dunlap telling me years ago that a lot of these questions were either so heavily edited as to be essentially made up or were picked and chosen from years of input to make whatever point the magazine writers wanted at the time. I would not be surprised at all if they were deliberately made to look as if the questioner was really stupid and the WTS so great and wise.

  • maninthemiddle
    maninthemiddle

    You don't have to back that far to find "questions from readers who think for themselves"

    ***w074/15p.30QuestionsFromReaders***

    Should a Christian avoid beverages and foods that contain caffeine?

  • JWoods
    JWoods
    There is an old Chinese proverb. If you give a man a fish you feed him for a day. If you teach a man to fish you feed him for a lifetime.

    Hmm...the way I heard that, Terry, was that you had taught him how to sit in the boat and drink BEER all day.

  • sd-7
    sd-7

    Of course. That explains it, Terry. Because if they taught you how to fish, you wouldn't need their fish anymore, and they'd be out of work.

  • LongHairGal
    LongHairGal

    Thank you for this post. I always said that the JWs act as if they want to be told which shoe to put on first. They are reduced to not wanting, or actually being afraid of thinking. I suppose because they do not WANT any responsibility for a bad choice they make so therefore they want to be told what to do every step of the way.

    I am sure when Jesus spoke of sheeplike people he did not mean for it to be like this. These people have literally abdicated their thinking faculties to somebody else. I wonder, though, if some of them think this makes them LESS morally responsible? Kind of a crowd mentality. Whatever the reasoning, it is pathetic.

    I myself also wondered if some of those Questions from Readers were 'planted' by somebody in HQ.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit