***********************************************************
MINDCHILD vs. JOELBEAR
AKA Skipper AKA Joel
***********************************************************
In the view of Jurors of the Grand Jury of Participants of Simon’s Board, within the website of JehovahsWitnesses.Com, hereby one Mindchild summons one Joelbear, on or about, henceforth, the date of this post, to a duel of competing paradigms. To Wit: Does the Jehovah’s Witness ideology deserve the same respect as any common established religion? Do former members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses have not only the right, but also the duty to disgrace, defile, and condemn the actions and dogma of the Watchtower Society? Should we respect the decision of someone to become a Jehovah’s Witness or return to their belief system?
It is the demonstrated view of Mindchild that the cumulative effect of actions and beliefs of the Watchtower Society inspire disgust or revulsion in persons with ordinary sensibilities and that their belief system is reckless as heretofore evident in display of posts on this site and from personal experience with the Watchtower Society. Mindchild maintains that the Jehovah’s Witnesses do not deserve respect as an established, common religion, and that the actions of the Watchtower Society are criminal against all humanity. Mindchild further argues that respecting the decision of someone to become a Jehovah’s Witness, either by original indoctrination or a person returning to Jehovah’s Witnesses is not proper and is like wishing someone to experience gross exploitation for a commercial corporation that regard the ruination of lives as a natural consequence of doing business.
I offer for evidence that Joelbear does not support this worldview by his posts in several threads, which include:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=19248&site=3
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=19051&site=3
I quote a brief segment of Joel’s posts here:
I believe the discussion board has become unbalanced to the point that a true discussion cannot take place. I see a progression of posters that I care about becoming more negative over time. I have always believed that the harsh words exchanged here between people are inappropriate for the seriousness of the discussion. This situation continues to get worse not better.I HEREBY challenge Joelbear to appear, under the penalty of public opinion, before his friends and my friends to discuss this important issue that goes beyond mere opinions. My intention is not to mock or shame Joelbear but to engage in a vigorous not viperous discussion that should help everyone here decide for themselves what the proper thing is to do, and make for an excellent reference for others in the future about these issues.I do not believe that Jehovah's Witnesses should be mocked for their beliefs. Again, the matter is simply too serious. This is simply an application of Matthew 7:12. You can't use the excuse that they do it so its okay for you to do it, its harmful and shouldn't be done.
I do not believe that we should loosely make swipes at all 6 million Jehovah's Witnesses with rash statements like, none of them love god, or, they all hide pedophiles. I get a sense that child abuse victims are being used rather than helped with this anti- Watchtower crusade. I have no proof. I indeed hope I am totally wrong. I have received private emails from people I trust who know personally of pedophilia cover ups involving people that I have known. This subject makes me ill. I don't believe a public discussion board is the place to make accusations or for victims to seek assistance.
I do honestly feel that many here including myself have let our animosity towards the witnesses cloud our thinking about what is indeed true.
In regard to the important nature of this discussion, Joelbear and Mindchild may at their own requests invite participation for those who support their views, or by having people here simply volunteer their own ideas in the threads. I would like however at this time to invite someone to play the role of JUDGE to only make sure we keep the postings in line with the spirit of fair play, to avoid name calling and character assassination by any parties and to more or less keep things focused on the issues. The winner of the debate is for each reader to decide. Hopefully all will enjoy good information and lots of fun if we can keep things civil.
Ok Joel…I give you the opportunity to present your opening arguments and to define your position. Again, please don’t look at this as a personal attack but as an opportunity to both share your views and perhaps grow.
This document was prepared by I. P. Standing,
Deputy Clerk of the Common Please
Skipper