U.S. Intervenes in European Debt Crisis

by leavingwt 24 Replies latest social current

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Fed Intervenes in European Debt Crisis

    After months of quietly watching from the sidelines, the United States finally intervened in the European debt crisis on Sunday night.

    The Federal Reserve announced that it would open currency swap lines with the European Central Bank — in essence, printing dollars and exchanging them for euros to provide some liquidity for European money markets and banks.

    The step came after a hectic week in which Washington began to fear that the sovereign debt crisis threatened to infect the American economy and hamper its recovery, according to several United States officials.

    The Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy-making arm, approved the swap lines in a vote taken by videoconference on Sunday morning. The European Central Bank’s president, Jean-Claude Trichet , asked for the Fed’s help in a telephone call on Saturday with the Fed’s chairman, Ben S. Bernanke .

    The intervention, which also involves the central banks of England, Switzerland, Canada and Japan, is part of a colossal package intended to quell the restive credit markets with a show of force and resolve that American policymakers had quietly believed was lacking. The package has two other elements: about $950 billion in loan guarantees from the European Union , and a decision by the European Central Bank to intervene in the bond markets through a series of refinancing operations.

    An initial rescue package for Greece, totaling around $140 billion, failed to calm investors last week. The sudden plunge in the stock market on Thursday exacerbated the worries of American officials.

    Mr. Trichet had a series of conversations over the past week with Mr. Bernanke, who in turn received assurances from the Obama administration that the Fed’s actions had the president’s support, according to officials involved in the discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    “It became increasingly clear that, if they were willing to take very strong measures, that it would be in the interests of the United States to encourage and support that,” one American official said.

    The official added, concerning the Europeans, “Clearly they understood that both the European Central Bank, in the first instance, and then the global community was much more likely to try to help them if they were first willing to do something big themselves.”

    In a statement, the Fed said the currency swaps were intended to make it easier for European companies, institutions and governments to borrow dollars when they need them, “and to prevent the spread of strains to other markets and financial centers.”

    The statement said the action was taken “in response to the re-emergence of strains in U.S. dollar short-term funding markets in Europe.” The statement added: “Central banks will continue to work together closely as needed to address pressures in funding markets.”

    The program announced Sunday night is broadly similar to one that the Fed introduced in December 2007, as the United States entered a recession caused by the collapse of its housing market.

    Under that program, the Fed provided dollars to central banks in exchange for an equivalent amount in foreign currency, based on prevailing exchange rates. The parties agreed to make the same exchange in reverese at a later date — anywhere from one day to three months later — using the same exchange rate as in the initial transaction.

    The swap operations do not carry any exchange rate risks or credit risks, the Fed said. The Fed would not be a party to whatever dollar-denominated loans the European Central Bank may make to European financial institutions.

    (An equivalent program was announced in April 2009 to give the Fed the ability to provide liquidity to American institutions in foreign currencies, but the Fed did not end up having to use that program.)

    The Fed actually made money from the previous dollar swap program. The foreign central banks paid the Fed interest equivalent to what they made from lending the dollars. The Fed, however, did not pay any interest on the foreign currencies it took in exchange, having agreed to hold them instead of lending them out or investing them in the private markets. The new program is designed the same way.

    In December 2008, at the height of the previous swap program, the Fed held $582.8 billion through the central bank liquidity swaps. That number fell to zero by the time the program ended in February of this year.

    The swaps are likely to produce a significant, if temporary, expansion of the Fed’s already giant balance sheet, which now totals around $2.3 trillion. The balance sheet grew as the Fed purchased mortgage-backed securities and longer-term Treasury debts as a way of holding down long-term interest rates.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/business/global/10swap.html

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    European Markets Surge

    European stocks surged Monday, as investors took heart from a €750 billion ($954.83 billion) rescue package intended to stabilize the single currency and prevent the Greek debt crisis from spreading to other member countries.

    Overnight, European Union finance ministers reached agreement on a support plan for nations facing financial meltdown. It will consist of up to €440 billion in loans from euro-zone governments and €60 billion from an EU emergency fund, in addition to €250 billion from the International Monetary Fund.

    At the same time, the European Central Bank confirmed it will buy bonds in the secondary market in order to ensure market stability.

    "The bailout package is music to investors' ears and the reaction has been quick and positive," said Joshua Raymond, market strategist at City Index. "The key worry for the last few weeks is that the Greek debt problems could become contagious and affect other countries within the euro zone that have similar debt problems. The rescue package from the EU and IMF is a firm attempt to draw a line under this uncertainty and looking at the market reaction, it seems to have done the trick."

    . . .

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703880304575235462819341480.html?mod=WSJ_Stocks_LeadStory

  • SacrificialLoon
    SacrificialLoon

    Yay! The casinos... errr stock markets are saved! Mugabenomics for everyone!

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Matt Welch. . .

    We Are Out of Money

    . . .

    Today may be terrible, but tomorrow is going to be much worse, at least as measured by such metrics as deficits, debt, and entitlement spending. In an April speech, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke laid out the misery that awaits us. “The arithmetic is, unfortunately, quite clear,” he said. “To avoid large and unsustainable budget deficits, the nation will ultimately have to choose among higher taxes, modifications to entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, less spending on everything else from education to defense, or some combination of the above.”

    Yet in the very next paragraph, Bernanke displayed the kind of cowardice that got us into and has helped extend our awful economic mess: “Today the economy continues to operate well below its potential, which implies that a sharp near-term reduction in our fiscal deficit is probably neither practical nor advisable. However, nothing prevents us from beginning now to develop a credible plan for meeting our long-run fiscal challenges.”

    States, counties, and municipalities, lacking Bernanke’s ability to print money, do not have the luxury of “beginning now to develop a credible plan” for the future. They are flat out of money in the present. But they too refuse to face reality.

    . . .

    http://reason.com/archives/2010/05/07/we-are-out-of-money

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    A view from one Libertarian. . .

    . . .

    Wake up America! How many million unionists are we expected to carry on our public payrolls? How long can we keep government employees on defined-benefit pension plans while the rest of us scramble to fund our 401(k)s ? How many more people are we going to drop from the income tax rolls as we lean on a smaller and smaller slice of citizens to carry an ever greater percentage of the load, leaving the rest free to vote for tax increases? How large a swath of our population can we pretend to keep supplied with newly manufactured economic rights like free healthcare as Social Security and Medicare careen toward insolvency? How much more do we think we can borrow from the Chinese to fund day-to-day government operations? How long do we think we can afford to police the world?

    What the world's political leaders and those who elect them need most right now is a shocking example of the only possible outcome of trying to practice redistributive justice on a national or even global scale. Rescuing Greece is a mistake. What they deserve is a good hard dose of exactly what they are asking for - unvarnished socialism.

    Throw Greece out of the European Union. Let them default on their debts. Teach buyers to beware before they invest in sovereign bonds. Dare Greece to print Drachmas by the wheelbarrow. Put the whole country on the public payroll then challenge them to demonstrate what a truly egalitarian society looks like. Maybe a dramatic spectacle of what a workers paradise looks like under the media's glare will teach us what's in store if we don't change our ways.

    Democracy is broken. You can't mix Freedom and Free Lunch. One or the other has got to go.

    http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2010/05/10/are_the_greek_riots_a_picture_of_our_future_98456.html

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Dow Industrials Jump 405 Points

    . . .

    The Dow Jones industrials are up 405 at 10,785, its biggest gain since March 2009.

    The Standard & Poor's 500 index is up 49 at 1,160. The Nasdaq composite index is up 109 at 2,375.

    About 3,000 stocks rose and about 150 fell at the New York Stock Exchange. Volume totaled 1.9 billion compared with 2.4 billion Tuesday.

    . . .

    http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2010/05/stocks_surge_on_effort_to_ease_europe_debt_crunch.php?ref=fpa

  • Robdar
    Robdar

    I guess ithe US has proven it's possible to be a pimp and a prostitute too.

  • Chalam
    Chalam

    The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency - Telegraph

    The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency

    The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity.

    By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
    Published: 7:18AM BST 03 Apr 2009

    Comments 57 | Comment on this article

    A single clause in Point 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 leaders amounts to revolution in the global financial order.

    "We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity," it said. SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.

    In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.

    It has been a good summit for the IMF. Its fighting fund for crises is to be tripled overnight to $750bn. This is real money.

    Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the managing director, said in February that the world was "already in Depression" and risked a slide into social disorder and military conflict unless political leaders resorted to massive stimulus.

    He has not won everything he wanted. The spending plan was fudged. While Gordon Brown talked of $5 trillion in global stimulus by 2010, this is mostly made up of packages already under way.

    But Mr Strauss-Kahn at least has resources fit for his own task. He will need them. The IMF is already bailing out Pakistan, Iceland, Latvia, Hungary, Ukraine, Belarus, Serbia, Bosnia and Romania. This week Mexico became the first G20 state to ask for help. It has secured a precautionary credit line of $47bn.

    Gordon Brown said it took 15 years for the world to grasp the nettle after Great Crash in 1929. "This time I think people will agree that it has been different," he said.

    President Barack Obama was less dramatic. "I think we did OK," he said. Bretton Woods in 1944 was a simpler affair. "Just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy, that's an easy negotiation, but that's not the world we live in."

    There will be $250bn in trade finance to kick-start shipping after lenders cut back on Letters of Credit after September's heart attack in the banking system. Global trade volumes fell at annual rate of 41pc from November to January, according to Holland's CPB institute – the steepest peacetime fall on record.

    Euphoria swept emerging markets yesterday as the first reports of the IMF boost circulated. Investors now know that countries like Mexico can arrange a credit facility able to cope with major shocks – and do so on supportive terms, rather than the hair-shirt deflation policies of the old IMF. Fear is receding again.

    The Russians had hoped their idea to develop SDRs as a full reserve currency to challenge the dollar would make its way on to the agenda, but at least they got a foot in the door.

    There is now a world currency in waiting. In time, SDRs are likely evolve into a parking place for the foreign holdings of central banks, led by the People's Bank of China. Beijing's moves this week to offer $95bn in yuan currency swaps to developing economies show how fast China aims to break dollar dependence.

    French President Nicolas Sarkozy said the summit had achieved more than he ever thought possible, and praised Gordon Brown for pursuing the collective interest as host rather than defending "Anglo-Saxon" interests. This has a double-edged ring, for it suggests that Mr Brown may have traded pockets of the British financial industry to satisfy Franco-German demands. The creation of a Financial Stability Board looks like the first step towards a global financial regulator. The devil is in the details.

    Hedge funds deemed "systemically important" will come under draconian restraints. How this is enforced will determine whether Mayfair's hedge-fund industry – 80pc of all European funds are there – will continue to flourish.

    It seems that hedge funds have been designated for ritual sacrifice, even though they played no more than a cameo role in the genesis of this crisis. It was not they who took on extreme debt leverage: it was the banks – up to 30 times in the US and nearer 60 times for some in Europe that used off-books "conduits" to increase their bets. The market process itself is sorting this out in any case – brutally – forcing banks to wind down their leverage. The problem right now is that this is happening too fast.

    But to the extent that this G20 accord makes it impossible for the "shadow banking" to resurrect itself in the next inevitable cycle of risk appetite, it may prevent another disaster of this kind.

    The key phrase is "new rules aimed at avoiding excessive leverage and forcing banks to put more money aside during good times." This is more or less what the authorities agreed after the Depression. Complacency chipped away at the rules as the decades passed. It is the human condition, and we can't change that.

    Related Articles

    UN wants new global currency to replace dollar - Telegraph

    UN wants new global currency to replace dollar

    The dollar should be replaced with a global currency, the United Nations has said, proposing the biggest overhaul of the world's monetary system since the Second World War.

    By Edmund Conway, Economics Editor
    Published: 6:45PM BST 07 Sep 2009

    Comments 628 | Comment on this article

    Crumpled dollar bill - UN wants new global currency to replace dollar A number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world's reserve currency

    In a radical report, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has said the system of currencies and capital rules which binds the world economy is not working properly, and was largely responsible for the financial and economic crises.

    It added that the present system, under which the dollar acts as the world's reserve currency , should be subject to a wholesale reconsideration.

    Although a number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world's reserve currency, the UNCTAD report is the first time a major multinational institution has posited such a suggestion.

    In essence, the report calls for a new Bretton Woods-style system of managed international exchange rates, meaning central banks would be forced to intervene and either support or push down their currencies depending on how the rest of the world economy is behaving.

    The proposals would also imply that surplus nations such as China and Germany should stimulate their economies further in order to cut their own imbalances, rather than, as in the present system, deficit nations such as the UK and US having to take the main burden of readjustment.

    "Replacing the dollar with an artificial currency would solve some of the problems related to the potential of countries running large deficits and would help stability," said Detlef Kotte, one of the report's authors. "But you will also need a system of managed exchange rates. Countries should keep real exchange rates [adjusted for inflation] stable. Central banks would have to intervene and if not they would have to be told to do so by a multilateral institution such as the International Monetary Fund."

    The proposals, included in UNCTAD's annual Trade and Development Report , amount to the most radical suggestions for redesigning the global monetary system.

    Although many economists have pointed out that the economic crisis owed more to the malfunctioning of the post-Bretton Woods system, until now no major institution, including the G20 , has come up with an alternative.

    Related Articles

    Blessings,

    Stephen

  • PrimateDave
    PrimateDave

    Stoneleigh: The Imperial Eurozone (With All That Implies)

    In the light of events in Greece, I want to address the structure and prospects for the eurozone, and specifically how the structure pre-determines the prospects. Talk about long term austerity measures in southern Europe by no means covers a worst-case scenario.

    All aggregate human structures at all degrees of scale are essentially predatory. They all convey wealth from a necessarily expanding periphery towards the centre, where wealth is concentrated. The periphery may be either forced or enticed to join the larger structure, but that does not affect the outcome. Such structures are all inherently self-limiting, as the fundamental dependence on the buy-in of new entrants grounds them in Ponzi dynamics.

    The Eurozone project is no different. The European periphery was sold an impossible dream - that they could by fiat have the same living standards as northern Europe. Perhaps the architects of the project believed that equalization by fiat would work, but whether their intentions were honourable or not is immaterial to the outcome.

    The Ponzi scheme was very effective, because the impossible dream was so appealing. The euro project gave people and companies and governments in the periphery access to far lower interest rates than they had ever seen before, and encouraged them to enter the gingerbread palace. The result was a manic period of credit expansion where people borrowed vastly more than they could ever hope to repay, just like the US subprime borrowers who indulged in the same dynamic. Attempting to borrow yourself into wealth absolutely never works, no matter where you live. The developing debt slavery further enriches the centre in the meantime, though.

    As we have discussed at The Automatic Earth many times, credit expansions create outward appearances of great real wealth. They do this by creating multiple and mutually exclusive claims to the same pieces of underlying real wealth pie. Many people feel wealthy, but that is perception, not reality. This wealth is virtual. The structure is Enron-esque. At maximum expansion it appears robust, yet it is destined to implode rapidly.

    (article continues at The Automatic Earth)

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    The bail out was a move for the banks..it's nothing more than financial terrorism against people who will be forced to pay off the debts of the gambler. Every time another billion is created and added to the account - it's another debt the people must work to pay off. Slaves to the bankers and governments of the world.

    Democracy is but a word. In reality I wonder if it really exists when representation is by fair and free elections - elections that cannot be free if bought and cannot be fair if fraudulent.

    Years ago, there were people who tried to report on activity related to one world banks and one world currencies. Globalization it's called but on the highest level. Those reporting on it were called conspiracy theorists and smug individuals smirked with self righteous assertion that no such thing could happen in their world.

    What we have is globalized banking with the global bankers calling the shots and the people paying whether or not they want to. People in the USA voted in the majority against the bail out but it was forced upon them. Now, the debts of other countries is also being forced upon them.

    All you thought you knew and all you thought you were part of has ceased to exist. It may be necessary to educate yourself on the what the future of a global new world governorship will bring. sammieswife.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit