Cheap cancer drug finally tested in humans

by glenster 10 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • glenster
    glenster

    After successfully slowing cancer growth in labs rats,
    Michelakis moved onto humans with an aggressive brain tumor
    called glioblastoma. The initial trial was supposed to only
    determine if their compound was safe, but the researchers
    were met with a surprise. Further evaluations showed that
    the majority of patients had no further cancer growth for
    15 months, while three out of the five showed an actual
    reduction.

    "We showed that DCA was killing the brain cancer cells,"
    Michelakis told CTV News. "But more importantly, we had
    evidence that DCA might be doing the same thing in cancer
    stem cells, which are the mother of all cancer cells."

    "It's now clear that targeting metabolism for cancer
    might be a new frontier for cancer," he continued.

    Another benefit to this form of treatment is that it
    only affects the sick cells, not the healthy ones as is
    the case with chemotherapy. Additionally, due to its oral
    intake the medicine can spread more easily through the
    body, reaching areas other treatments cannot.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetic_acid
    http://www.3dgameman.com/news/2010/05/13/cheap-cancer-drug-finally-tested-humans
    http://www.tonic.com/article/could-cancer-treatment-be-an-easy-pill-to-swallow/

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    Very cool

  • JeffT
    JeffT

    The problem with most cancer drugs is not killing the patient during the course of therapy.

    I took care of lab animals being used in a metabolic study of cancer about thirty years ago. The same problem showed up, we could starve the cancer, unfortunately we also starved the animal in the process.

    I'm not knocking this, I'm just saying don't hold you breath waiting for it to get to your doctor.

  • cult classic
    cult classic

    thanks for sharing glenster - i hope it helps

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    If this is the research using DCA, it's phenomenal news! They are now investigating the possibility of using it for breast cancer and lung cancer as well. The results are extremely optimistic!

    We should be clear though.

    People have long been advocating the cure for some cancers may lie in DCA but this is an orphan drug and so there is NO money in it for big pharma. They refused to fund any studies into the cure using this drug which is cheap and generic. Instead money came from donations for the study and it was completed with great results!

    sammieswife.

  • rebel8
    rebel8

    Additionally, due to its oral intake the medicine can spread more easily through the body, reaching areas other treatments cannot.


    That makes no sense at all. Oral meds have to pass through the entire digestive tract, making them a lot more "indirect" than intravenous. Why that would make them more effective is a mystery to me.

    Secondly I noticed no reputable source is cited in the OP.

    After spending .0002 seconds on a Google search, I found out it's been around for over a century and has been studied several times before. The results did not provide evidence supporting the claim it was a cure for cancer.

    http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Dichloroacetate-DCA.asp

    It's great these things are being studied and of course I hope it works....but I am pretty skeptical of all these cancer cure claims. Making cancer cure claims is a sure-fire way to get web traffic and sales of snake oil products, because cancer patients are desperate and there are always vultures ready to pounce.

    Cancer.org and cancer.gov have pretty thorough assessments of many alternative treatments.

  • metatron
    metatron

    This cancer researcher says that it has never been systematically tested for cancer in patients. So, hope exists.

    http://scienceblogs.com/terrasig/2010/05/dichloroacetate_dca_brain_canc.php?utm_source=networkbanner&utm_medium=link

    There have been a number of substances that sit on the shelf with little or no support from non profit organizations or governments - and no support from drug companies.

    The Japanese showed dramatic effects with a seaweed extract years ago, for example. Proper financial support for testing unprofitable cures is lacking.

    metatron

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    From the wiki article, it restores mitochondrial function, which opens an apoptotic pathway. The cancerous cells then commit suicide. Cancer, by definition, is a multiplication of cells that should have shut themselves down due to damage.

    Sapc-DOPs also induces apoptosis:

    http://www.bexionpharma.com/

    DAVANAT, on the other hand, removes the ability of solid tumors to hide from the immune system. Immune cells, "killer cells" can then attack the cancer, which is what they normally do with mutated cells in the body. DAVANAT also removes many of the side effects of chemotherapy when used in combination with 5FU, because it also blocks inflammatory response.

    http://www.pro-pharmaceuticals.com/clincal-purpose-1-006.htm

    BTS

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    Metatron, it costs many many millions-sometimes billions- to navigate the FDA approval process. It also takes years. This locks out many drugs because the profitability isn't there on the backend to fund the process on the front end. It's a huge problem.

    Proper financial support for testing unprofitable cures is lacking.

    Research universities are more than happy to test promising compounds, but this is not the same as FDA clinical trials.

    BTS

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    DCA research on brain cancer

    Published: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 - 14:01 in Health & Medicine

    Medical Researchers at the University of Alberta reported today evidence that the orphan generic drug Dichloroacetate (DCA) may hold promise as potential therapy for perhaps the deadliest of all human cancers: a form of brain cancer called glioblastoma. The report is published at the journalScience Translational Medicine, a journal of the American Association of the Advancement of Science; it appears today at the journal's web sitehttp://www.sciencemag.org/ In 2007 the U of A team led by Dr. Evangelos Michelakis, published evidence that DCA reverses cancer growth in non-human models and test tubes. The team showed then that DCA achieves these antitumor effects by altering the metabolism of cancer. By altering the way cancer handles its nutrient fuels, specifically the sugars, DCA was able to take away cancer's most important strength, the resistance to death. Since then, several independent groups across the world have confirmed the Alberta team's findings. In December 2009, the editors of "Science" predicted that cancer metabolism is one of only 5 areas across all scientific disciplines, to "watch for major breakthroughs" in 2010.

    The U of A team set out to show that the way that DCA works in actual patients is the same with the way it works in the lab. In addition, researchers wanted to show whether DCA is safe and possibly effective in very sick patients with brain cancer.

    By extracting glioblastomas from 49 patients over a period of 2 years and studying them within minutes of removal in the operating room, the team showed that tumors respond to DCA by changing their metabolism. Then, the team treated 5 patients with advanced glioblastoma and secured tumor tissues before and after the DCA therapy. By comparing the two, the team showed that DCA works in these tumors exactly as was predicted by test tube experiments. This is very important because often the results in non-human models tested in the lab do not agree with the results in patients. In addition, the team showed that DCA has anti-cancer effects by altering the metabolism of glioblastoma cancer stem cells, the cells thought responsible for the recurrences of cancer.

    In the 5 patients tested, the drug took 3 months to reach blood levels high enough to alter the tumor's metabolism. At those levels, there were no significant adverse effects. However, at some of the higher doses tested, DCA caused nerve malfunction, i.e. numbing of toes and fingers. Importantly, in some patients there was also evidence for clinical benefit, with the tumors either regressing in size or not growing further during the 18 month study.

    No conclusions can be made on whether the drug is safe or effective in patients with this form of brain cancer, due to the limited number of patients tested by the study's leads Drs Michelakis and Petruk. Researchers emphasize that use of DCA by patients or physicians, supplied from for-profit sources or without close clinical observation by experienced medical teams in the setting of research trials, is not only inappropriate but may also be dangerous. The U of A results are encouraging and support the need for larger clinical trials with DCA. This work is also one of the first in humans to support the emerging idea that altering the metabolism of tumors is a new direction in the treatment of cancer, Michelakis and Petruk said.

    The research team hopes to secure additional funding to continue the ongoing trials with DCA at the University of Alberta. Further studies would include more patients with brain cancer, and test the combination of DCA and standard chemotherapies, eventually including patients from other academic health sciences centres.

    One of the intriguing features of this work was that it was funded largely by public donations, including philanthropic foundations and individuals. In addition, it received strong support by Alberta public institutions, both the University of Alberta and Alberta Health Sciences. The multidisciplinary team that performed this challenging translational research included members of the Departments of Medicine, Diagnostic Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, Oncology and Neurosurgery. Clinicians, scientists, nurses and graduate students worked together for 2 years and express their gratitude to the people of Alberta, philanthropists, the patients and their families.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit