What I am more worried about is that they are wary in taking risks in cleaning up the spill. What they really need is to get as much of the oil out of the water as they can, at the same time they stop dogging filling in the leaks and drilling another well to get the remaining oil out of that area. This one needs to have safety equipment that perhaps was missing on the original. And, we need technology to extract most or all of the oil out of the water, not just disperse it.
But, more important, we need to get past oil. Accidents are going to happen--and we need to learn from them. But, oil is in finite supply, and we are simply going to run out of the stuff if we don't move past it. Or, OPEC could pull another 1973 type embargo at will, causing our country to go into another stagflation like the 1970s. We, as a nation, got a write-up to that effect back in 1973. Yet, I see nothing moving forward toward nuclear fusion, extracting heat out of the earth, and energy sources beyond our planet. Not to mention, developing theories that allow free energy (and, by free, I do not mean Osama Obama paying for it with my tax dollars. I mean that it doesn't deplete resources.).
We need to quit being afraid of accidents. Rather, we need to work on the technology to clean up after them (and reclaim all that oil or radioactivity that is going to waste), and to prevent them from continually happening in the first place. But, unless we accept that there are going to be accidents and spills, we have the alternative of shutting everything down and killing off all of our trees to use as firewood to keep warm in winter, and accept that we are going to swelter in summer. Plus, no more stoves (except the smoky wood stoves that will kill as many from smoke as could die in mining accidents), computers, cars, fast transportation, or being able to enjoy your Christmas tree without burning down your house (and putting as much pollution in the form of smoke as they are putting into the Gulf in the form of spilled oil).