How can you read Mathew chapters23/24 and refer to 'the possible interpretation in it to the fall of Jerusalem?'
Your are a kind and decent man who tries to see goodness and truth in all things. This comes through in every post you make. Alas the world of humans is far more duplicitous than you seem able to accept.
Oh, I agree that it does mean that, though it doesn't come out and say, " the romans are gonna kick your asses and turn this plac einto a parking lot".
And IF proof comes out the Matthew was written AFTER the fact, woudl I view it as fake?
Nope.
Why?
Well, many oral stories were written decades or more after they first got told, that is nothing new in History.
It woudl just mean the words got penned decades after they were said.
Remember, I don't view sciptures as inerrant.
Here is a little memo from Jeremiah, one that Jesus accused the scibes also:
8 How can you say, “We are wise,
and the law of the Lord is with us,”
when, in fact, the false pen of the scribes
has made it into a lie?