Bible Contradictions

by brotherdan 33 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • alice.in.wonderland
    alice.in.wonderland

    God good to all, or just a few?

    Psalms 145:9 The LORD is good to all: and his tender mercies are over all his works.

    Jeremiah 13:14 And I will dash them one against another, even the fathers and the sons together, saith the LORD: I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy them.

    What was stated in Psalms 145:9 was a praise of David referring to the dominion of ancient Israel during David's reign. Although God repeatedly delivered the Israelites from their enemies, his compassion eventually reached its limit. According to Jeremiah they practiced idolatry, bringing idols into God's temple, mocking his prophets. The Israelites reached a point where there was no longer any proper basis for compassion. They did this kind of stuff all throughout the Hebrew scriptures.

  • Doug Mason
    Doug Mason

    It all relies on one's understanding of the Bible. It is a collection of books written over about 900 years by many people from divergent communities and edited by many during the ages. Each writer and editor had their eye focused on directly influencing their own immediate community.

    When recording history, for example, their purpose was to use their interpretation of history to influence their community, rather than being concerned with literal accuracy. Their records were theological history.

    The NT Gospels are not intended to be a literal documentary record. They were shaped by the objectives of the original authors, employing their own local cultural understandings, idioms, language, etc.

    Since each group of writers had a different background and outlook, their records differ. Each group invented the birth and crucifixion stories in a way that suited the purpose of each community. None of them was there to provide an eyewitness account of either event. Similarly with the Temptation and with Christ's baptism.

    Consider the arguments that Paul's philosophising had with with the Jewish Christians' legalistic requirements. Contrast Paul's view on the Law with "no joy or tittle will be removed from the Law".

    There were several disconnected NT Christian groups, often at odds with one another. For several centuries, each held on to its preferred written records until the 4th century, when the state church accepted the list prepared by Athanasius. Given his preference for Paul's philosophising over James' and Peter's Jewish legalism, this influenced the dominating list of NT books. Learn the history.

    The "generations" of Jesus as given are different because they are theological lists. Look at their structure.

    Regarding a "virgin" mother, I suggest that when you read the second chapter that I have provided, that you remember the chronological sequence (Paul, then Mark, then Matthew, etc).

    http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=92180179253f98a4785829a3dc302e1b

    Wait 25 seconds for the "Download" button to appear.

    The reapplication of Isaiah's "maiden" of his own time into the "virgin" of the NT writers shows how they handled the Hebraic material.

    We must not read the Bible through Western eyes of the 21st century. The words must be read through the eyes and ears of the culture that composed the text. It is not a technical, scientific, document but a record produced by many people. After all this, we should be amazed there is as much agreement between the books.

    An interesting book might be: "The Unauthorized Version: Truth and Fiction in the Bible", by Robin Lane Fox.

    Doug

  • ghostt
    ghostt

    Has any one ever noticed that there are no pyramids in the Bible? Despite the fact that these structures would have certainly been the talk of the ancient world? Also there are no cats in the bible either, eventhough the cat was of the most significant animal figures in Egyptian religion. Also the Bible fails to record the names of the pharaohs of Egypt, who held such great importance to the people of Israel, while it is filled with the names of many other ancient kings.

  • Leolaia
    Leolaia

    Well it does name pharaohs like Shishaq (= Shoshenq), So (= Osorkon), Necho (= Necho II), and Hophra (= Apries). These are all kings from the 22nd Dynasty and later, none as early as the Middle and New Kingdoms which are closer to the presumed eras of Abraham, Joseph, and Moses. Those various kings are all called "Pharaoh", without any personal name.

  • agonus
    agonus

    "Correctamundo", not "exactamundo."

    And yes, both Samuel L. Jackson and Morgan Freeman are both equally God. No contradictions there, sonny.

  • Black Sheep
    Black Sheep

    In Matthew Jesus vandalises a fig tree the morning after he threw out the money changers.

    In Mark he vandalises the tree on his way to Jerusalem to throw out the money changers.

  • alice.in.wonderland
    alice.in.wonderland

    War or Peace?

    Exodus 15:3 The LORD is a man of war: the LORD is his name.

    Romans 15:33 Now the God of peace be with you all. Amen.

    It's God's advisories that have time and time again, instigated war. The necessary consequence of man’s right to life is his right to self-defense. In a civilized society, force may be used only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use. All the reasons which make the initiation of physical force an evil, make the retaliatory use of physical force a moral imperative.

  • lesabre
    lesabre

    alice has a swastica on her post.... >.<

  • sabastious
    sabastious
    Even more confusing, if Jesus supposedly was born from a virgin mother, how does Joseph lineage have anything to do with Jesus? He wasn't his father.

    Wait a second....

    -Sab

  • notverylikely
    notverylikely

    And yes, both Samuel L. Jackson and Morgan Freeman are both equally God. No contradictions there, sonny.

    And so it James Earl Jones. It's a trinity.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit