What, then, of animal food? May it be used if there is reason to believe there is blood in it? As far as a Christian is concerned, the answer is No, on the basis of principles already mentioned. Therefore, if a Christian discovers that blood components are listed on the label of a container of dog food or some other animal food, he could not conscientiously feed that product to any animal over which he has jurisdiction. He could not conclude that doing so would be excusable, for this would not be a case of an animal killing another animal and helping itself to the blood of that creature. No, this would be a direct act on the part of the Christian, making him responsible for feeding blood to a pet or other animal belonging to him.
Of course, if there is no indication on the label of a package of animal food that the product contains blood, a Christian might conclude that it could be used. Still, his conscience might trouble him. In that case he should put his conscience to rest by making reasonable inquiry and acting in accord with the information he receives, for a Christian surely desires to have a good conscience before God.—1 Pet. 3:21.
But now, what about fertilizer that has blood in it? One who is going to show respect for God’s law on blood would not use it. True, according to the Mosaic law, blood when taken from a body was to be poured out upon the ground and covered over with dust. (Lev. 17:13, 14) The objective was, however, that the blood should serve no useful purpose when thus disposed of. It was not placed on the ground with the thought in mind that it would serve as fertilizer. Hence, no Christian farmer today could properly spread blood on his fields to fertilize the soil, nor would he use commercial fertilizer containing blood. Such blood use would be a commercializing on something that God has reserved for himself. It would be a violation of God’s Word.
Does anyone ever really, I mean, REALLY, read the shit that the WTS publishes?
Even though Fluffy the cat eats mice and birds and Rex the dog eats squirrels and rabbits...unbled, uncooked and unkosher...giving them cat or dog food that "might" be processed with blood in it is againt God's law? WTF? Seriously...what the fuck? Is giving live mice to Sammy the snake a violation of God's law as well? Unfuckinbelievable...
Now, let me get this straight about fertilizer... one can't use fertilizer if it has blood in it, because "blood should serve no useful purpose" once it's "taken from the body".
Um, what about blood fractions? How can you justify the use of parts of blood that has to be removed from whole blood if "blood should serve no useful purpose" once it's "taken from the body"? Of course, the real answer is that the WTS makes this shit up as they go along and they end up contradicting themselves as they continue to revise their position.
When you read the stupidity that is shit like this, you really have to start wondering just how gullible and stupid people really are. I know, I know... I was right there with them one time, but luckily, I figured out how to use my brain before it completely atrophied.