debator.
Thank you for your reply.
However..., I'd like to say to you first.
You have not answered to my question at all.
I said like this.
"Are you Ms. Reniaa?"
Why don't you answer to this question of mine?Although I do not know the circumstances in overseas, in Japan, multiple pen-names (multiple nicknames) is an act most disliked by people.
If something actually happened you will get racial memories as with the flood spanning countries and oceans, literally many different versions of the same event. You cannot just say one came from the other especially when the People involved had very little contact with each other, if any.
Since the moderator of this forum said my website is SPAM, I do not show the address usually.
But, in such a case, I think that it is needed to show the address of my web page.
That is a matter which I have explained on my website.
That is, it is the "ship" in the Chinese character (Kanji in Japanese).
http://godpresencewithin.web.fc2.com/pages/zatsugaku/kanji.html
I have not denied value/worth of the Bible.
I myself am a Christian, IMO.
However, I do not interpret the Bible literally.
People doubted King David was real until a archaeolgy un-earthed a stone naming him.
With regard to the King David, I have not made reference in conversation with you.
Well, a certain people consider that the King David did not exist really.
If he existed really truly, another issue will arise. (For example, 1 Samuel 18:27; 2 Samuel 3:14)http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/1sa/chapter_018.htm#bk27
http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/2sa/chapter_003.htm#bk14
Can you explain the meaning of that King David's good conduct?
Scepticism is it's own enemy since you can no longer see the truth in anything.
For me, although I think that you are the very that person. LOL
I already said like this.
"But, I think that such your ill-bred reply pulls "another question" near further."http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/199894/3/Can-we-trust-this-website-About-the-subject-in-which-Jehovahs-Witnesses-were-a-NGO
Are you really an active Jehovah's Witness?
In that ill-bred manner of speaking of yours, in the field service, I think that probably people would not listen to your talk.
First of all, I think that since the society's representatives did not do an ill-bred manner of speaking like you, the United Nations permitted they use the library.
Do you think that they did a manner of speaking always like you to a receptionist of that library?
possible