You know what the sad thing is? As funny as Mary's story is, it is not exaggerated by much.
Exactly. The story is so vague that no one outside of the zombies who have to listen to such tripe on Sunday mornings, would believe it. There are no surnames, no cities, no company names that are provided. When I did the pseudo-article, I mentioned a 'world famous theme-park' without specifically naming 'Walt Disney World'. Why? Because the minute WDW is mentioned, there would be some way to verify whether or not the events described actually happened. With a bit in spit and elbow grease, it would probably be possible to find out the name of the executive at Disney World who places orders for robotics and ask him/her if this story is true or not. The person would verify that it was a complete fabrication and might even sue the WTS for lying about them like that.
However, when you simply use the phrase "a world famous theme park" with no names attached, the goons in the Writing Department can say 'well, how do you know we weren't referring to Universal Studios in Orlando?' or some such crap. It goes back and forth, back and forth because they don't want you trying to verify anything because they know full well that 95% of the stories are built upon sand---kinda like their prophecies. If you notice, the only time they ever reference anything is to their own publications.