GLOBAL WARMING - "Snowfalls are a thing of the past"

Nathan Natas

Cetainly in Great Britani they are, right?

see: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html

.

Oh, that's from ten years ago!

How accurate was THAT prophecy?

bohm

Im just curious, is your point is that David Viner was wrong in predicting the consequences of global warming, and therefore this somehow mean global warming does not constitute a problem?

Surely you dont imply that one scientists inability to accurately predict the consequences of some effect mean the effect itself is not taking place?

Nathan Natas

Are you trying to say that one effect of GLOBAL WARMING is more snow? HA ha ha ha ha ha!

bohm

NN: The effects would be a change in climate which can have the effect that more snow fall in some areas due to a change in humidity. Im not sure why that is so problematic.

So how would you answer my questions?

Judge Dread

Nathan did not write the article.

The author is a false prophet and has lost all credibility.

Nothing that he writes, has written, or will write, should be believed.

That's the standard for false prophets, right?

JDW

bohm

Judge Dread: No i dont think so. Do you? If you ever wrote something that was proven wrong noone should ever listen to you again? Science is not about oppinions.

And by the way, can you pinpoint the place where the author claim what he wrote was under divine inspiration? I believe that is a requirement to be a false prophet, but perhaps you have another definition?.

I am aware NN did not write the article (duh), but as i am sure you can see i asked him about his oppinion on the article because i think its somewhat unclear what his point is.

I think thats a fair question.