I wonder how the books would have affected you if you had known the history of the organization as well as Stephen knew Israel’s, as revealed by his impromptu defense before the Sanhedrin.
It appears many simply didn’t know, since they thought the books "removed the curtains."
Even Ray admits that he was weak on organizational history.
No doubt, for many, the books were like an avalanche.
For those who had read all the organization’s available writings…perhaps they viewed them more like a snowball.
If so, perhaps they were able to analyze the books differently, seeing underneath the apparent (in their view) sincerity, candor, credibility, tone, etc.
Also, knowing personalities involved, being peers of Ray, working closely with him over the years, knowing the way he worked in the background, the way he got individuals to talk about controversial topics, etc., would cause them to have a different view than many.
"He who states his case first seems right until another comes to examine him." (Proverbs)
All should examine all the facts. "What a shame-yes, how stupid!-to decide before knowing the facts!" Good Book at Pro. 18:13.
M