He is grounded in his time. Today a woman would not anoint him with oil, do his hair and feet. I believe he acquired a reputation as a teacher whether or not He was recognized as a messianic figure. He was a man. It is interesting b/c my women's Bible study analyzed the passage where he refuses, at first, to heal a nonJew. I said he was acting in a very nonJesus manner and condemned it while acknowledging that Jews thought that way. The women were well-educated but were very uncomfortable with my statements. The leader went on and on about how wonderful He is in this passage. I made my point so I said well, He changed his mind. Otherwise, His actions are contemptuous and don't follow his other teachings. My Name, can we move on now?
She had a platform for ten minutes. I tend to be terse in oral presentations. I had all of one minute.
Jesus is puzzling, coy, and radical. His actions are inconsistent. Scholars noted this from the beginning but I sat in my time out box.He doesn't fit in neat tacky boxes all in a row. He is not groovy. The social gospel is only one aspect of His ministry. Everyone is not sitting around and singing Pete Seeger folk songs. He was not a Royal Shakesperean Company actor, tall and pale with blue eyes filled with Hollywood sparkle drops.
I studied Jesus in a seminar taught by Elaine Pagels at Columbia before she went to Princeton. Everyone in the class had to take the New Testament and read the primary sources. She said Jung wrote that we project ourselves onto Jesus. We were to write three adjectives to describe Jesus in very short order. I wrote down Witness stuff altho I did not believe it. Every Christian in the room failed. We wrote what our churches taught us. The only students who were factually correct were three Jewish Orthodox males, taking the course b/c it looks good on medical school apps.
Do people truly want to worship a God so easily defined? God is supposed to have a trascedent quality. For all the agony of being a Witness, sheer determination should count for something.