JW FOOL COMMENTS ON WHY I'TS NOT A CULT !

by Hairyhegoat 24 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Medina
    Medina

    I quote:

    ''11. There is nothing mystical or esoteric, occultish in the worship of Jehovah's Witnesses. These are things to be avoided, according to the Bible. There are not hidden levels of knowledge that one gradually attains to, or that are revealed at different stages of progress. The meetings of Jehovah's Witnesses are open to the public, to persons who are not Jehovah's Witnesses. Revelation 22:17.''

    The New Elder book, anyone? It is forbidden wisdom, only obtaint by elders, COs or other JWs of higher rank.

  • wobble
    wobble

    "There are not hidden levels of knowledge that one gradually attains to, or that are revealed at different stages of progress"

    Another downright lie.

    If they told the house-holder or person newly associated, all the ramifications of the DFing policy, the Blood Doctrine and being "seperate from the world" etc. etc. nobody in there right mind would join, mind you, I don't think that many who join are in their right mind !

    You never find out about these things, and others like the 1914 doctrine, until you are commited by baptism.

  • DJPoetech
    DJPoetech

    The article is a total misrepresentation of the Jehovah's Witness life. If there is such freedom as expressed, why even consider it important to practice?

    There would be no point with that much freedom other than just to be a part of the club.

    Most of the things he talks about are true from an uninvolved point of view. Since he isn't part of the "cult", he can make these claims without any quams.Yet he attempts to be an authority because he apparently "studied up."

    He fails to relate the very real aspect of "prejudicial leaven" that comes between those who accept these points of view and those who don't readilly accept it. Its hard to measure but it exists and is an important aspect. He blows them off as "opposers" early in the article.

    If anyone wants to look at the true face of any religion or cult, go to those who are not accepted in it.

    Isn't that what Jesus did?

    Or to take it further, look at any organization. You can find its worth by looking at how it cares for the lowest/worse-off within it.

    I think that principle is in line with bible teachings.

  • Mad Sweeney
    Mad Sweeney

    I posted the following comment. It is awaiting approval:

    "When you can choose your definition of cult, it is easy to refute any accusation of being one. Semantic arguments and strawmen aside, below is the common meaning most English speaking people are thinking when they use the term "cult." Does it fit Jehovah's Witnesses? Let the reader decide.

    If the organization displays unquestioning commitment to its leadership and regards the belief system, ideology, and practices as the truth, as law,

    If questioning and dissent are discouraged or even punished by excommunication and/or shunning,

    If the organization claims a special, exalted status for itself, If the organization has an us-versus-them mentality as regards to other religions and the rest of the world,

    If the leaders are not accountable to any humans, not even the organization's membership, but only to God, If the leadership induces feelings of shame or guilt in order to influence and/or control members' behavior,

    If the organization requires reducing or cutting ties with non-member family and friends, radically altering the personal goals and activities a member had before joining the group,

    If the organization is preoccupied with bringing in new members,

    If the members are expected to devote large amounts of their time to group meetings and activities,

    If loyal members feel there can be no life, no happiness outside the group and feel there is no other valid way of living,

    If the organization fosters dissatisfaction with the present and encourages members to participate in time-consuming organizational activities that promise to lead to a better future,

    then it's a cult."

  • Mad Sweeney
    Mad Sweeney

    This thread was more than two weeks ago. No new comments have been "approved" yet. The most recent comment on the article is from the author himself, and is from December. Apparently, no comments that tell the truth about the Borg are going to be approved.

    Maybe I should add to the list.

    If facts that make the group look bad are ignored as if they don't exist,

    itsacult!!!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit