by NeckBeard 26 Replies latest jw friends
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/03/20/libyan-tv-claims-48-killed-us-european-attacks.html
http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/number-of-libyans-killed-by-western-air-strikes-rises-to-64-afte/
Should Obama be tried as a war criminal for crimes against humanity?
BTT
LIBYAN CIVILIANS BEING KILLED BY US AIRSTRIKES
Of course they are.
Yes, they should all be rounded up and prosecuted for war crimes.
Civilians die in war. It is unavoidable. As long as they're not intentional targets, there's no crime.
This war, IMO, should go directly at Ghadaffi, not just his military infrastructure. Find him and kill him, as well as potential heirs to his dictatorial throne.
Considering all that's happened with Libya and the US................is Obama still an undercover Muslim Commy? Was his giving the thumbs up on attacking Libya sufficient enough proof that he's not a Muslim Commy?
As long as they're not intentional targets, there's no crime.
I have to 100% disagree with that statement. There is such thing as an accident, yes. But to knowingly commit to a course of action where innocents will die, and then dismiss your responsibility by saying that it isn't a crime because you did not intentionally target them... that is a crime. IMO.
War begets war. What could be forgiven isn't... I think in part because of people (presidents, regimes, whatever) labeling the victims as collateral damage. If someone strikes back at the States (perhaps at the White House or wherever the person who gave the order is thought to be) because their loved ones were once collateral damage, is someone who loses their loved ones in that counterattack going to understand that their loved ones are now labeled as collateral damage? It wasn't intentional, after all.
Tammy
Tammy, you know you're cute when you're disaggreeable.
I must be cute a lot then.
must be cute a lot then.
Well yeah, but the argument be made you're just doing what your gender does......
Show reason and intelligence, you mean?
