LOL @ outlaw
Six Screens Goon Is Fearon's PC Smearer
by PublishingCult 34 Replies latest jw friends
-
HintOfLime
PublishingCult: BAIL OUT.
If Rick won't play ball... DON'T PLAY BALL. Tell him to f* off. Do not play by his 'rules'.
Rick is a self-absorbed jackass. He doesn't care about you, or anyone on this website. He only cares about HIS OWN OVER-INFLATED EGO, and how many cult followers he can get. (Just look at the wack-a-do picture he posts of himself repeatedly.)
He will not promise you ANYTHING. He is a COWARD. All he wants is DRAMA to draw people into his bullshit.
Please! Tell everyone that it is OFF until Rick MANS UP, and agrees to your terms. Tell everyone NOT TO CALL IN TO FREAKTARD's SHOW.
Otherwise, you are just getting suckered into giving the drama whore what he wants - AN AUDIENCE.
Think about what you'll really get, and what he'll get - You will get nothing (he's a coward, afterall) and he will get callers (into his 'worldwide protest').
If you do call in, and Jonny isn't there - Feron clearly isn't a competent organizer. Perhaps we need a new conference that is run by someone who is competent.
- Lime
-
PublishingCult
HintOfLime, you make an excellent point, a point I have been thinking about since Rick decided not to agree to any reasonable terms. I can handle both Rick and Johnny. Rick is a slittering snake, and I already know which way he intends to slither. I'm still thinking.
I am not sure I would ever do a program in a conference call format; that would mean anyone and everyone could call up and join in. I'm not having Jim Ignatowski, John Doe from the movie Se7en, and former acid heads turned Born Again running free on an open phone line. I think in doing so, Rick is playing ringmaster to a pride of gimpy circus animals and pack of ass-clowns offering handjobs to each other.
I would only ever do a show that would dignify relevant guests and give credibililty to important topics. Might accept calls, but they would definitely be screened.
PC
-
MeanMrMustard
PC,
You have a PM.
Thanks,
MeanMrMustard
-
freetosee
Thank you for posting the vid PC!!! Well said! The sound is good.
I wonder what active JW's would think, when they hear all this? I would have taken offence with the use of the words asshole, butt load.. and the final statements about the existence of god and the foundation of Christianity. Today I agree.
fts
-
PublishingCult
I wonder what active JW's would think, when they hear all this? I would have taken offence with the use of the words asshole, butt load.. and the final statements about the existence of god and the foundation of Christianity. Today I agree.
I don't recall using "asshole" but I might have. There is always something for a Christian to take exception too. I don't care if they are offended or not. It's a form of expression that no other words could ever convey. Swearing effing rocks.
Anyway, the thing that most pisses me off about Christians like Fearon and his following is that;
John 4:23-24 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”
. . . well, those jerkoffs always forget to bring the truth when they go around representing "the Father".
-
Farkel
Publishing Cult,
You are quite talented. I particularly enjoyed the interview with the lying twit at the San Diego District Assembly. What a piece of work he was!
Keep up the good work!
Farkel
-
PublishingCult
Thanks, Farkel.
A lot of JW's are in such denial about their own behaviors that they often accuse me of faking the entire video. It has been asserted I paid thousands of extras to walk by and stand around with JW name badges, all bankrolled by the catholic church, lol.
The story behind that vid is simply this: I was trying, awkwardly, to get a clear shot of the name badge for V at WT Comments, and so I had to think of something to ask and have some lame ass reason to put the camera in his face. I just started asking questions. The rest is history.
-
Mad Sweeney
Perhaps we need a new conference that is run by someone who is competent.
This is on the right track, I think. Maybe more of an Internet radio broadcast with a chatbox feature. That way, the host can read comments and share them on-air as he sees fit, and as they fit the flow of the conversation. The speakers on the show, then, would be limited to the host and his/her guests, and rather than "callers" there would be "commenters" from whom the host chooses the best comments/questions.
-
PublishingCult
Perhaps we need a new conference that is run by someone who is competent.
This is on the right track, I think. Maybe more of an Internet radio broadcast with a chatbox feature. That way, the host can read comments and share them on-air as he sees fit, and as they fit the flow of the conversation. The speakers on the show, then, would be limited to the host and his/her guests, and rather than "callers" there would be "commenters" from whom the host chooses the best comments/questions.
Workin on it, actually. I already have three guests lined up to come on my program, all of which are surprises. Two of them you have heard before, but we hope to have some new stories and information from them, and the third is an author/attorney/minister who is going to refute some WT doctrine that has never been tackled yet.
oh, and I am definitely bringing this gal on for a chat! Anyone wanna bet me I can get her on the show?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WGFPdwoSr8&feature=channel_video_title