In Argentina, a young woman is refusing a blood transfusion that would save her life

by dgp 32 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • dgp
    dgp

    A 21-year old woman from Argentina is refusing a blood transfusion. Here's my translation from Spanish, plus the original Spanish for anyone to check.

    http://www.laautenticadefensa.com.ar/noticias.php?sid=84322

    A young woman refuses a blood transfusion that would save her life
    On account of her religion. A court ruling upheld her right to "conscientious objection".

    Carolina Magnin is twenty-one years old and is fighthing for her life. Not because her ailment is serious, but because she refuses to receive the right treatment for anaemia. Carolina is a member of the Jehovah's witnesses, a religion that, among other things, forbids its faithful [from taking] blood transfusions, which it deems sinful.

    The young woman was admitted into the hospital on May 18, after she endured a severe hemorrhage because of an hormonal disorder. This is a condition that could have been reverted easily, all the more consdiering that she is a healthy young person, but her refusing a transfusion continues to put her life at risk.

    The young woman signed a written consent form in front of the doctors to prevent a transfusion from being given to her. Also, an appeal for protection was filed from the hospital, a decision on which was given by judge Aleli Kalf in favor of the young woman's stance. "[The judge] made a decision in favor of the patient's conscientious objection, on the basis of the vast jurisprudecen that exists on the matter", explained yesterday Eduardo More, the hospital's legal counsel, during a demonstration headed by the young woman's father in front of the hospital. "We must always stand in favor of life, but the judge refused the appeal and therefore we are giving her less-than-optimum treatment", added the head of the Municipal Health Department, Miguel Rosini. "We must pray that she won't suffer another hemorrhage", said the official.

    "As her father, my hands are tied, but I want to do something to save my daughter. Life must be above any other right" said [the young woman´s] father, who "must struggle" also against the beliefs of the young woman's mother, who is also a faithful of the same religion and has had influence on the young woman's decision, who, as of yesterday, was going to be transferred to a different location.

    The notion of [blood] transfusions as a sin

    The doctrine according to which this medical treatment is "a sin" was not established by the founder of this religious denomination, Charles Russel, but was instead put in place during the presidency of Mr. Nathan Knorr in an article titled "The Holiness of Blood".

    The main argument given in support of forbidding blood transfusions is that the Bible forbids the consumption of blood, and, according to the Witnesses, a blood transfusion is the same as eating blood.

    Eating blood as food and a blood transfusion are absolutely different things. When we eat, we ingest organic matter (from either a plant, an animal, or fungi) orally, which organic matter is then broken down into simple components that [the human body] may then assimilate, that is, glucose, aminoacids, fatty acids and glycerol. Then, during the absorption process, nutrients enter the circulatory system, which distributes nutrients all over the organism. On the other hand, a transfusion is a medical procedure meant to restore the blood volume in case a patient has lost much blood as a result of a serious hemorrhage or another cause. If a transfusion is not given soon enough, oxygen transport cannot take place and as a result the patient may enter into shock and finally die.



    The young woman's father and the Head of the Municipal Health Department participated in the demonstration that took place yesterday in favor of the young woman's health.


    The hospital's director and legal counsel explained the situation that has arose with regard to this young woman.

    "Life [must be] above all beliefs, read the signs.

    I may add that the signs in the first picture read (left to right):

    "Up with Life. Down with instigating suicide"

    "[Stand up] for the life of Carolina Magnin"

    "Carolina deserves to live. Help us"

    The signs on the third picture read:

    Life!!! above all beliefs.

    Life is a non-negotiable good.

    The original Spanish:

    Una joven se niega a recibir una transfusión que salvaría su vida

    Es debido a la religión que profesa. Un fallo judicial amparó su derecho de "objeción de conciencia".

    Carolina Magnin tiene 21 años y lucha por su vida, no por la gravedad de su cuadro, sino por su negativa a ser tratada correctamente de su cuadro de anemia. Carolina es testigo de Jehová, una religión que entre otras cosas prohíbe a sus fieles las transfusiones de sangre, a las que considera un pecado.

    La joven ingresó al hospital local el 18 de mayo luego de sufrir una grave hemorragia a raíz de un desorden hormonal. Se trata de un cuadro que fácilmente podría haber sido revertido más teniendo en cuenta que se trata de una persona sana y joven, pero la negativa de la joven a recibir una transfusión sigue poniendo su vida en riesgo.

    La joven firmó un consentimiento por escrito ante los médicos para evitar que se la transfunda. De igual manera desde el hospital se presentó un recurso de amparo ante la justicia local que fue resuelto por la jueza de Garantías Aleli Kalf a favor de la postura de la joven. "Resolvió a favor de la objeción de conciencia de la paciente, en base a una vasta jurisprudencia que existe al respecto", explicó el doctor Eduardo More, abogado del hospital, ayer durante una movilización que encabezó el padre de la joven en la puerta del nosocomio. "Nosotros siempre debemos proyectarnos hacia la vida, pero la jueza rechazó el amparo y estamos brindando un tratamiento que no es el óptimo", agregó el secretario de Salud, Miguel Rosini. "Debemos rogar que no tenga una nueva hemorragia", bregó el funcionario.

    "Yo como padre de ella tengo las manos atadas, pero quiero hacer algo para salvar a mi hija. La vida tiene que estar sobre cualquier derecho", afirmó su padre, quien debe "luchar" también contra la creencia de la madre de la joven, quien también profesa la misma religión y ha influido en la determinación de la joven, quien ayer iba a ser trasladada a otro establecimiento, según se señaló.

    La idea del "pecado" de la transfusión

    La doctrina que establece que este tratamiento médico es "pecado" no fue establecida por el fundador de la denominación religiosa, Charles Russel, sino que fue establecida durante la presidencia del señor Natan Knorr, en un artículo titulado: "La Santidad de la Sangre".

    El argumento principal que se presenta para prohibir las trasfusiones sanguíneas es que en la Biblia se prohíbe consumir sangre y según los Testigos, realizarse una transfusión equivale a consumirla.

    Consumir sangre como alimento y realizar una transfusión son cosas totalmente diferentes. Cuando comemos, estamos ingiriendo oralmente materia orgánica (vegetal, animal u hongos), y tras un proceso digestivo queda reducida a componentes simples que pueden ser asimilados, es decir: glucosa, aminoácidos, ácidos grasos y glicerol. Luego, en el proceso de absorción, los nutrientes pasan al sistema circulatorio, el cual los distribuye por todo el organismo. Por otra parte, una transfusión es un procedimiento médico que busca restablecer el volumen sanguíneo después que un paciente haya perdido mucha sangre como resultado de una grave hemorragia u otra causa. De no realizarse una transfusión a tiempo, el transporte de oxígeno no puede realizarse y por lo tanto el paciente puede sufrir un shock y finalmente morir.

    El padre de la joven junto al Secretario de Salud participaron de la movilización que se realizó ayer pidiendo por la salud de la joven.


    El director del hospital y el abogado del nosocomio explicaron la situación planteada en torno a la joven.


    "La vida por sobre todas las creencias", aseguraban los carteles.

  • No Room For George
    No Room For George

    Thanks for the post/link.

  • Broken Promises
    Broken Promises

    That is so sad - a young life about to be snuffed out because of the dictates of a fundamentalist religion and a father who is helpless against a legal decision.

    Murderers!!

  • PSacramento
    PSacramento

    She is 21 years old, nothing that can be done.

    Its a very tricky slope because the whole "no bood" doctrine is NOT so clear as to show there is coerrsion on the part of the WT.

    It openly states it is an interpretation and leaves it up to the individual person to choose what to do.

    I don't think that you will find any legal document in the WT publications that state a penalty for taking a blood transfusion, which obsolves the WT from any legal issues.

    It is quite sad that ANY religion promotes this to begin with but perhaps even sadder that an indivudual who's lif eis at risk doesn't have the sense to truly and fully study the issue.

    All in all a very sad situation.

  • Mary
    Mary
    I don't think that you will find any legal document in the WT publications that state a penalty for taking a blood transfusion, which obsolves the WT from any legal issues.

    Actually, they do have written down that if you accept blood, you can and will be disfellowshipped:

    "Questions from Readers:
    "In view of the seriousness of taking blood into the human system by a transfusion, would violation of the Holy Scriptures in this regard subject the dedicated, baptized receiver of blood transfusion to being disfellowshipped from the Christian congregation?" "The inspired Holy Scriptures answer yes."---Watchtower, January 15, 1961, p. 63

    In addition to the immediate punishment, they also brainwash the R&F into believing that by accepting a transfusion, you've jeapordized your or your kid's chance at everlasting life:

    "They know that if they violate God's law on blood and the child dies in the process, they have endangered that child's opportunity for everlasting life in God's new world......it may result in the immediate and very temporary prolongation of life, but that at the cost of eternal life for a dedicated Christian."----- BLOOD, MEDICINE AND THE LAW OF GOD

    So basically, they terrify the followers with the threat of losing all your JW family and friends now, plus you'll have to contend with Jehovah murdering you and/or your child at Armageddon if you accept a transfusion right now. With that sort of emotional blackmail hanging over your head life the Sword of Damacles, is it any wonder that to some Witnesses, an 'honorable death' is preferable? Like I've said before, if the Governing Body members were all charged with Assisted Suicide whenever a Witness dies due to the blood doctrine, they'd change their minds pretty damn quick.

  • dgp
    dgp

    I beg to disagree with the idea of "no coercion".

    - A witness who accepts a blood transfusion is disfellowshipped.

    - Now, people will say whatever they want, but Hospital Liaison Committees exist for the purpose of making sure no witness accepts a blood transfusion without the elders knowing. I had a friend who died of cancer at a very young age. She endured therapy until she felt it made no sense to continue fighting for her life, and told the doctors that she wanted to die in peace, with her loved ones. They put her on an ambulance, and she died on her way. There was no need for any committee to be there for her to stand by her choice. Why do they have to exist in the case of witnesses?

    - The more you read about Jehovah's witnesses, the more you realize that their entire operation is based on fear and terror. "You'll die unless you do as we say". Had the girl chosen a blood transfusion, she'll "die", and not a death that she has been told to be temporary, but eternal death.

    So much for no coercion.

    I expect assholes like the members of the Governing Body (if assholes may excuse me for such an unfair comparison), and their even worse asshole attorneys to make sure nothing can be proved against them on paper. "Why are you looking forward to 1975?", they were able to say. They are perfectly capable of forcing a young girl to die this way over this blood thing, a matter in whose regard they allow themselves to disagree. If you don't believe me, why is it that they can decide a matter with two thirds of the vote?

    Being a worldly, I side with the father. The laws of his country are telling him that if his girl is brainwashed by a cult, then she must die and he has not any recourse against it.

    I think that anything you do to tell the world that the witnesses ARE NOT FREE to refuse a blood transfusion is morally correct. It is such a crime that the death of a young woman because of brainwashing will now be considered "her right".

  • Alfred
    Alfred

    I believe the WT has allowed some leeway recently... now you're allowed to accept a blood transfusion as long as you cry during your Judical Comittee hearing and say you failed Jehovah... then they'll forgive you or look the other way...

  • PSacramento
    PSacramento

    I am speaking of right NOW, what is the OFFICIAL WT position about Blood?

    I am not sure how one goes about proving coersion in a matter like this to be honest.

    Since the person is the one saying THEY do not want blood. I don't see Her saying she CAN'T have blood or the WT will kick her out, know what I mean?

  • sir82
    sir82
    I believe the WT has allowed some leeway recently... now you're allowed to accept a blood transfusion as long as you cry during your Judical Comittee hearing and say you failed Jehovah... then they'll forgive you or look the other way...

    I think that's the way it can work out, but it's tricky.

    A true-blue JW would never try to "game the system" and "fool Jehovah".

    A cynical hanger-on, one is remains a JW just for family contact, might well have a reputation as being a "slacker" and it would likely be hard to convince the JW kangaroo committee that her tears were genuine.

  • Dune
    Dune

    Part of the reason i started thinking about leaving the religion was the blood transfusion policy. I remember a kingdom ministry with updates about what doesn't "count" as blood (white blood cells, plasma, etc) and asked myself if i would be willing to die because some guy in Brooklyn decided that it was ok to get a fraction of a red blood cell, and not the whole.

    With regards to the article, I think we're hitting a gray area considering that this isn't a child who doesn't fully understand the implications of refusing treatment. The person in the article is a grown adult who can make her own decisions and knows she may die. We know that the WT is a fraud, but in her own reality she's doing the right thing.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit