You worship an evil jerk, Dawkins politely points out that the guy you worship is an evil jerk, therefore Dawkins is an asshole.
Nope, and I don't think his an asshole and I think you missed the point of why SOME may think he is.
Actually, Dawkins does a pretty good job of describing that god. Not one thing there is untrue. Now if you believe that a god with those traits is holy and good, then you have no problem with the summary. If it makes you uncomfortable---well think of how uncomfortable all those dead Canaanites (babies too) were when they met the people who worshipped such a god.
Indeed, Dawkins does a good job of describing an interpretation of the OT biblical God, he does a good job of voicing his opinion.
That isn't the point either.
Taking what Richard has said and done, his clod and impersonal letter to his daughter for example, I can also state that:
Dawkins is a cold hearted, souless, arrogant, ass that has relationship issues ( his divorces), that likes to pretend he is an expert about things he has only a rudimentary and passing highly selective knowledge about, He makes himself to be more than others, insinuates that those that don't think like him or agree with his views are ignorant and not very bright, he has shown to acre more about his child view of the world then whether his child is content, happy or even healthy, He crusades against views he disagrees with, militantly, even if he has no reason to do so.
And I would be right based on my highly selective interpretation of the limited facts I chose to acknowldge and how I choose to acknowledge them.
And guess what? I'd be ok in doing this because it is only my opinion.
I would be WRONG, but still "ok".